Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

EFL TEACHERS’ DEMANDS AND PREFERENCES ON IN-SERVICE TRAINING IN TURKEY

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
945–958
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study has implications for policymakers, who are in the process of designing anINSET model for Foreign Language Teachers, as well as teacher trainers who carry out INSET.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the significant means of ensuring quality instruction in language classrooms isestablishing an effective program of continuing professional development for languageteachers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Descriptive in nature and following a quantitative researchdesign, the present study collected data from 985 state and private school teachers via a scaledeveloped by the researchers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study has implications for policymakers, who are in the process of designing anINSET model for Foreign Language Teachers, as well as teacher trainers who carry out INSET.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

One of the significant means of ensuring quality instruction in language classrooms isestablishing an effective program of continuing professional development for languageteachers. When conducted efficiently as a part of CPD, in-service training (INSET) proves tobe a key component in improving teachers’ instructional skills as well as keeping theirmethodological knowledge up-to-date. Nonetheless, both state-led and private-held INSETefforts in Turkey receive considerable criticism regarding their inefficiency and insufficiency.One of the reasons for any ineffectiveness might be INSET program developers’ negligence intaking into consideration teachers’ actual needs. Thus, more empirical research that exploreslanguage teachers’ demands and preferences on in-service training should be carried out invarious contexts. Consequently, this study aims to investigate English teachers’ demands andpreferences on an INSET program. Descriptive in nature and following a quantitative researchdesign, the present study collected data from 985 state and private school teachers via a scaledeveloped by the researchers. Having ensured construct validity via factor analysis, the scaleconsisted of three sub-factorial groups: demands on INSET, preferences regarding the contentand the trainers, and personal preferences. The findings displayed some statistically significantdifferences between state and private schools, novice and experienced teachers, and betweenteachers who had previous INSET experience and those who do not at different sub-factorialgroups. The study has implications for policymakers, who are in the process of designing anINSET model for Foreign Language Teachers, as well as teacher trainers who carry out INSET.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜRSOY, E., ÖNALAN, O. (2022). EFL TEACHERS’ DEMANDS AND PREFERENCES ON IN-SERVICE TRAINING IN TURKEY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 945–958. https://ajindex.com/articles/540480

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Altun, T. (2011). INSET (In-service Education and Training) and professional development of teachers: A comparison of British and Turkish cases. Online Submission. US-China Education Review A6. 846-858.
  2. Arslan, S., Mirici, İ. H., & Öz, H. (2019). In-service training needs of EFL teachers in nonformal education settings. SEFAD, 42, 223-244.
  3. Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139–147.
  4. Aydin, A., & Baskan, G. A. (2005). The problem of teacher training in Turkey. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 19(2), 191-197.
  5. Balbay, S., Pamuk, İ., Temir, T., & Doğan, C. (2018). Issues in pre-service and in-service teacher training programs for university English instructors in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 48-60.
  6. Bayar, A. (2014). The components of effective professional development activities in terms of teachers’ perspective. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, (6)2, 319– 27. British Council. (2019). İngilizce öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimini desteklemek üzere, Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü ile British Council arasında Mutabakat Beyanı imzalandı. Retrieved March 08, 2020, from https://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/press-office/meb-letter-of-aggrement
  7. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
  8. Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Çimer, S. O., Çakır, I., & Çimer, A. (2010). Teachers’ views on the effectiveness of in‐service courses on the new curriculum in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 31–41.
  10. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, (38)3, 181–9.
  11. Desimone, L.M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teacher's professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, (7)3, 252–63.
  12. Elyas, T., & Al Grigri, W. H. (2014). Obstacles to teaching English in Saudi Arabia public schools: Teachers’ and supervisors’ perceptions. International Journal of Language Teaching, 2(3), 74-89.
  13. Emery, H. (2012). A global study of primary English teachers’ qualifications, training and career development. (ELT Research Paper No.12-08). British Council. Retrieved from ht