Incremental Forming of Titanium Grade 2 Sheet by TPIF-RL Method

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thus, more homogenous wall thickness is ob-tained.In this study, Titanium Grade 2 sheet is formed as a cone via TPIF-RL method.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:This new method ensures a homogeneous wall thickness distribution.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Incremental sheet forming · Titanium · TPIF-RL method

Abstract

TPIF-RL method is a new method that gives better wall thickness in incremental forming. In this method, the sheet is not fixed at the edges. Like the deep drawing process, it is compressed with a certain pressure. During the forming process, the sheet flows under the blankholder. Thus, more homogenous wall thickness is ob-tained.In this study, Titanium Grade 2 sheet is formed as a cone via TPIF-RL method. Optimum forming parameters were determined by Signal/Noise analysis. In addi-tion, finite element analysis of the process was performed. Using 2 bar clamping pressure, 1000 mm/min feedrate, 0.75 mm increment and 15 mm forming tool di-ameter optimum result was obtained. With these optimum parameters, 6% thin-ning occurs on sheet thickness. This new method ensures a homogeneous wall thickness distribution.

Anahtar kelimeler

Incremental sheet forming Titanium TPIF-RL method Thickness distribution FEM

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Seçgin, Ö., Özsert, İ., Nart, E. (2022). Incremental Forming of Titanium Grade 2 Sheet by TPIF-RL Method. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 386–389. https://ajindex.com/articles/540477

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

Sbayti M, Bahloul R, Belhadjsalah H, Zemzemi F. Optimization techniques applied to single point incremental forming process for biomedical application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;95:1789–804
Grzancic G, Hiegemann L, Ben Khalifa N. Investigation of new tool design for incremental profile forming. Procedia Eng. 2017;207:1767–72
Mulay A, Ben BS, Ismail S, Kocanda A, Jasiński C. Performance evaluation of high-speed incremental sheet forming technology for AA5754 H22 aluminum and DC04 steel sheets. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2018;18:1275–87
Kumar A, Gulati V. Experimental investigation and optimization of surface roughness in negative incremental forming. Meas J Int Meas Confed [Internet]. 2019;131:419–30. Available from:
Malyer E, Müftüoğlu HS. The Influence of Friction Conditions on Formability of DC01 Steels by ISF. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng. 2015;12(3):134–8
AL-Obaidi A, Kunke A, Kräusel V. Hot single-point incremental forming of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (PA6GF47) supported by hot air. J Manuf Process [Internet]. 2019;43(August 2018):17–25. Available from:
Ambrogio G, Gagliardi F, Conte R, Russo P. Feasibility analysis of hot incremental sheet forming process on thermoplastics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;102(1–4):937–947
Najafabady SA, Ghaei A. An experimental study on dimensional accuracy, surface quality, and hardness of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy sheet in hot incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;87:3579–88
Miguel V. Influence of temperature on alloy Ti6Al4V formability during the warm SPIF process. Procedia Eng [Internet]. 2017;207:866–71. Available from:
Seçgin Ö, Özsert İ. Experimental investigation of new blank holder approach for incremental forming method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019 Mar 17;101:357–65
Raju C, Sathiya Narayanan C. Application of a hybrid optimization technique in a multiple sheet single point incremental forming process. Measurement [Internet]. 2016;78:296–308. Available from:
Baruah A, Pandivelan C, Jeevanantham AK. Optimization of AA5052 in incremental sheet forming using grey relational analysis. Measurement. 2017;106:95–100
Fiorentino A, Feriti GC, Giardini C, Ceretti E. Part precision improvement in incremental sheet forming of not axisymmetric parts