KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment

Ahmet Oğuz AKÇAY
Ufuk GÜVEN
Engin KARAHAN
Sayfa
409–422
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Online peer assessment · Elementary Teacher Education · Traditional peer-assessment

Özet

The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.

Abstract

The goal of this study is to compare traditional peer evaluation and online peer evaluation in order to identify which method is more effective in evaluating peers. Qualitative research method was used in this study to understand pre-service teachers’ opinions on different peer evaluation techniques. The study was carried out in a state university in Turkey. The sample consisted of 58 second year pre-service teachers majoring in primary school teacher program who enrolled in “Instructional Technologies and Material Development” course. Pre-service teachers were divided into 11 groups, with five or six students in each group. Participation was voluntary and the students in each group actively participated in the traditional and online peer assessment activities. The analyses of the data were done via content analysis, by creating categories and then themes. The themes that emerged as a result of the analysis of the data collected within the study were (1) objectivity, (2) evaluation criteria, (3) interaction, and (4) attributes of the online evaluation platform. The study concluded that a combination of peer and instructor evaluation and even self-assessment can give a better validity and objectivity of assessment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKÇAY, A. O., GÜVEN, U., KARAHAN, E. (2022). The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 409–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/540079

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ashenafi, M. M. (2019). Online peer assessment datasets. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.13050.pdf
  2. Bhat, B. A., & Bhat, G. J. (2019). Formative and summative evaluation techniques for improvement of learning process. European Journal of Business & Social Sciences, 7(5), 776-785.
  3. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529-549.
  4. Bradley, B. (2020). Using alternative assessment. https://ctl.byu.edu/using-alternative-assessments
  5. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 3, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
  6. Chen, Y-C., & Tsai, C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802646297
  7. Chin, P. (2007). Peer assessment. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 3, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i3.410
  8. Davies, P. (2002). Using students reflective self-assessment for awarding degree classifications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(4), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000210161034
  9. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer, and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
  10. Duran, M., Mihladiz, G., & Balliel, B. (2013). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin alternatif değerlendirme yöntemlerine yönelik yeterlilik düzeyleri [Adequacy levels of primary school teachers towards alternative assessment methods]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 26-37.
  11. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175 187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800950320212
  12. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. Routledge Falmer. Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2007). Formative and summative assessments in the classroom. http://ccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/formative_and_summative_assessment_in_the_classroom.pdf
  13. Hatch, A. J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
  14. Herbert, N. (2007, January). Quantitative peer assessment: Can students be objec