Dergiler / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Validity Evidence for the Perceptions of Secondary School Students of ‘What Research is’ Scale and Measurement Invariance

Sayfa
684–703
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Recommendations for future studies and future directions for research are discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Research is a concrete action in academia which has uplifted societies’ prosperity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To fill this gap, Yeoman et al. (2016) qualitatively developed an instrument measuring secondary school students’ perceptions of what research is.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Recommendations for future studies and future directions for research are discussed.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Research · What research is · Student perception

Özet

Research is a concrete action in academia which has uplifted societies’ prosperity. Although researchers have given particular attention to student perceptions about what research is in a higher education context, little attention has been given to secondary school students’ perceptions about this issue. To fill this gap, Yeoman et al. (2016) qualitatively developed an instrument measuring secondary school students’ perceptions of what research is. The present study quantitatively validates this scale using the dataset originally used to qualitatively validate it. The factor structure of the ‘what research is’ scale and measurement invariance across gender, school type, and key stage was examined. The sample is composed of 2634 secondary school students in seven schools located in East Anglia, UK. The data from this original sample showed a relatively acceptable fit to the four-factor structure after omitting some items. The result also highlighted that whilst there was evidence on configural and metric level invariance (i.e. the factor structures and the factor loadings of the scale are equivalent across gender, school type, and key stage), scalar level invariance was not met (i.e. the item intercepts of the scale are not equivalent across gender, school type, and key stage). Recommendations for future studies and future directions for research are discussed.

Abstract

Research is a concrete action in academia which has uplifted societies’ prosperity. Although researchers have given particular attention to student perceptions about what research is in a higher education context, little attention has been given to secondary school students’ perceptions about this issue. To fill this gap, Yeoman et al. (2016) qualitatively developed an instrument measuring secondary school students’ perceptions of what research is. The present study quantitatively validates this scale using the dataset originally used to qualitatively validate it. The factor structure of the ‘what research is’ scale and measurement invariance across gender, school type, and key stage was examined. The sample is composed of 2634 secondary school students in seven schools located in East Anglia, UK. The data from this original sample showed a relatively acceptable fit to the four-factor structure after omitting some items. The result also highlighted that whilst there was evidence on configural and metric level invariance (i.e. the factor structures and the factor loadings of the scale are equivalent across gender, school type, and key stage), scalar level invariance was not met (i.e. the item intercepts of the scale are not equivalent across gender, school type, and key stage). Recommendations for future studies and future directions for research are discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERYILMAZ, N. (2022). Validity Evidence for the Perceptions of Secondary School Students of ‘What Research is’ Scale and Measurement Invariance. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 684–703. https://ajindex.com/articles/540059

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775
  2. Archer, L., Osborne, J., DeWitt, J., Dillon, J., Wong, B., & Willis, B. (2013). ASPIRES: Young People’s Science and Career Aspirations, age 10 14. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ecs/research/aspires/aspires-final-report-december-2013.pdf
  3. Archer, L., Moote, J., MacLeod, E., Francis, B., & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10-19. UCL Institute of Education. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10092041/15/Moote_9538%20UCL%20Aspires%202%20report%20full%20online%20version.pdf
  4. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In: Pajares F and Urdan T (eds) Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Information Age Publishing, pp. 1–43.
  5. Bazley, S. (2019). Ensuring Societal Advancement through Science and Technology: Pathways to Scientific Integration. CUSPE Communications https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.38893
  6. Bills, D. (2004). Supervisors' conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296099
  7. Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in higher education, 26(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076255
  8. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485 499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
  9. Butz, A. R., & Usher, E. L. (2015). Salient sources of self-efficacy in reading and mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 49 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.001
  10. Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2010). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1 68. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
  11. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  12. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 9(2), 233 255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2n