KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Implant stability and bone height changes for immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures with locator attachments

Elsayed A. ABDEL-KHALEK
Nesreen El MEKAWY
Sayfa
96–104
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Marginal boneheight measurements and implant stability values were assessed atthe time of implant placement (baseline), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 weeksthen every 6-month interval up to 18 months post-implant placement.Results: The implant stability values decreased markedly from thebaseline, during 4 weeks and, then increased gradually until reachingthe initial values after 12 weeks followed by continuous increase tostudy’s end (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of attachment placementon initial stability and bone height changes for immediately loadedsingle-implants retaining mandibular overdentures.Methodology: Twenty edentulous patients were recruited for thisstudy; 9 females (45.0%) and, 11 males (55.0%) (age ranged from 59.0to 70.0 year).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Single endosseous implant was inserted in themandibular midline region.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Marginal boneheight measurements and implant stability values were assessed atthe time of implant placement (baseline), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 weeksthen every 6-month interval up to 18 months post-implant placement.Results: The implant stability values decreased markedly from thebaseline, during 4 weeks and, then increased gradually until reachingthe initial values after 12 weeks followed by continuous increase tostudy’s end (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of attachment placementon initial stability and bone height changes for immediately loadedsingle-implants retaining mandibular overdentures.Methodology: Twenty edentulous patients were recruited for thisstudy; 9 females (45.0%) and, 11 males (55.0%) (age ranged from 59.0to 70.0 year). Single endosseous implant was inserted in themandibular midline region. Immediately after surgery; Locatorabutment was secured on the implant, and the male housing wasconnected intraorally using direct pick-up procedure. Marginal boneheight measurements and implant stability values were assessed atthe time of implant placement (baseline), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 weeksthen every 6-month interval up to 18 months post-implant placement.Results: The implant stability values decreased markedly from thebaseline, during 4 weeks and, then increased gradually until reachingthe initial values after 12 weeks followed by continuous increase tostudy’s end (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ABDEL-KHALEK, E. A., MEKAWY, N. E. (2022). Implant stability and bone height changes for immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures with locator attachments. International Dental Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 96–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/539555

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-4
  2. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, et al: Mandibular two implantsupported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients- the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009;207:185-6. (Crossref
  3. Kern M, Att W, Fritzer E, et al. Survival and complications of single dental implants in the edentulous mandible following immediate or delayed loading: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2018; 97:163-70. (Crossref
  4. Policastro VB, Paleari AG, Leite ARP, et al. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, PeriImplant and Kinesiograph Parameters in Wearers of One-or Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2018 doi: 10.1111/jopr.12796. (Crossref
  5. Nogueira TE, Aguiar FMO, de Barcelos BA, Leles CR. A 2- year prospective study of single- implant mandibular overdentures: Patient- reported outcomes and prosthodontic events. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(6):541-50. (Crossref
  6. Liddelow G, Henry P. The immediately loaded single implantretained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:13-21
  7. Nogueira TE, Dias DR, Leles CR. Mandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:1004-16. (Crossref) 8. de Souza Batista VE, Vechiato-Filho AJ, Santiago JF Jr, et al. Clinical viability of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47(9):1166-77 (Crossref
  8. Passia N, Kern M. The single midline implant in the edentulous mandible: A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18:1719-24. (Crossref
  9. Srinivasan M, Makarov NA, Herrmann FR, Müller F. Implant survival in 1- versus 2-implant mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27:63-72. (Crossref
  10. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomized control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:330-7. (Crossref
  11. Kronstrom M, Davis B, Loney R, Gerrow J, Hollender L. Satisfaction and clinical outcomes among patients with immediately loaded mandibular overdentures supported by one or two d