KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth

Hatice ÖZDEMİR
Zeynep YEŞİL DUYMUŞ
Sayfa
117–122
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Data were analyzed withone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan test (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of artificial saliva,disinfectant solution, distilled water, and thermocycling on Vickershardness of 4 commercial brands of acrylic resin denture teeth.Methodology: Four different brands of acrylic resin denture teeth (MajorDent, Acry Lux, Acry Rock, Imident Lux) were evaluated. 15 anterior and15 posterior teeth of each group embedded in autopolymerized acrylicresin.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The teeth were submitted to different conditions: (1) storagein distilled water at 37±2°C for 7 days; (2) storage in artificial saliva at37±2°C for 30 days and (3) storage in 1 % sodium hypochlorite.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Data were analyzed withone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan test (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of artificial saliva,disinfectant solution, distilled water, and thermocycling on Vickershardness of 4 commercial brands of acrylic resin denture teeth.Methodology: Four different brands of acrylic resin denture teeth (MajorDent, Acry Lux, Acry Rock, Imident Lux) were evaluated. 15 anterior and15 posterior teeth of each group embedded in autopolymerized acrylicresin. The occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth and the vestibule surfacesof anterior teeth were flattened by using silicon carbide paper. Afterpolishing, microhardness measurements were repeated three times foreach teeth. The teeth were submitted to different conditions: (1) storagein distilled water at 37±2°C for 7 days; (2) storage in artificial saliva at37±2°C for 30 days and (3) storage in 1 % sodium hypochlorite. After,thermal cycling between 5 and 55 °C for 2500 cycles was made. Themicrohardness measurements were repeated. Data were analyzed withone-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan test (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, H., DUYMUŞ, Z. Y. (2022). The effect of different solutions and thermocycling on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. International Dental Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 117–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/539547

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Eckert SE, Jacob RF, Fenton AH, Merickske-stern RM. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete denture and Implant-supported prosthesis. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 195-8
  2. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2006. p. 544-6
  3. Rhan AO, Heartwell CM. Text book of complete dentures. 5th ed., London, 1993, Lea&Febiger
  4. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:386-95. (Crossref
  5. Phillips RW. Science of Dental Materials. 9th ed., Philadelphia, 1991, W.B. Saunders Co
  6. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials, 10th ed., Philadelphia, 1996, W.B. Saunders Co
  7. Wakefield CW. Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:143-6. (Crossref
  8. Kahn RC, Lancaster MV, Kate W Jr. The microbiologic crosscontamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:556-9. (Crossref
  9. Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Teraoka MT. The effect of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:749–52. (Crossref
  10. Brace ML, Plummer KD. Practical denture disinfection. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:538-40. (Crossref
  11. Lin JJ, Cameron SM, Runyan DA, Craft DW. Disinfection of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:202-6. (Crossref
  12. McCabe JF, Smith BH. A method for measuring the wear of restorative materials in vitro. Restorative resins: abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88:557–68
  13. Blau PJ, Lawn BR, editors. Microindentation techniques in materials science and engineering, ASTM STP 889. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1986. p. 196–205
  14. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites. Dent Mater 1992;8:218–23. (Crossref
  15. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied dental materials, 8th ed., Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1998. p. 4–28
  16. Abe Y, Sato Y, Taji T, Akagawa Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. An in vitro wear study of posterior denture tooth materials on human enamel. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:407–12. (Crossref
  17. Zeng J, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Hosoi T. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:453–7. (Crossref
  18. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A. Sho