Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The evaluation of different smile parameters in the Turkish population

Sayfa
1–6
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While the last visible maxillary tooth during the social smile is mostly the maxillary secondpremolar tooth, it is the maxillary second molar tooth at least.Conclusions: The incidence of some smile parameters in young Turkish population varies according to gender.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: In the past, patients and dentists thought that the dental aesthetics could only be ensured with modifications on teeth.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study is to evaluate the smile type (ST), smile line (SL), maxillary incisal line types (ML), and buccal corridor widths (BC) related to the smile aesthetics.Methodology: A total of 190 individuals (92 males and 98 females) aged between 18 and 25 years, living in different cities of Turkey and studying at Atatürk University, Faculty of Dentistry were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While the last visible maxillary tooth during the social smile is mostly the maxillary secondpremolar tooth, it is the maxillary second molar tooth at least.Conclusions: The incidence of some smile parameters in young Turkish population varies according to gender.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: In the past, patients and dentists thought that the dental aesthetics could only be ensured with modifications on teeth. Together with the latest developments in the smile analysis and aesthetic design, researchers have identified the aesthetics based on facial, oral-facial, dentogingival, and dental components. The aim of this study is to evaluate the smile type (ST), smile line (SL), maxillary incisal line types (ML), and buccal corridor widths (BC) related to the smile aesthetics.Methodology: A total of 190 individuals (92 males and 98 females) aged between 18 and 25 years, living in different cities of Turkey and studying at Atatürk University, Faculty of Dentistry were included in the study. In the study, the smile types, smile lines, maxillary incisal curvaturesandbuccalcorridorwidthsoftheindividualswere examined.Results: In the young Turkish population, the most common ST in both genders is the commissural smile, and the least common ST is the complex smile. The most common SL is the SL, and the least common SL is the high SL, and it varies by gender. While the most common ML is the convex line in both genders, the least common ML is the reverse incisal line. While the last visible maxillary tooth during the social smile is mostly the maxillary secondpremolar tooth, it is the maxillary second molar tooth at least.Conclusions: The incidence of some smile parameters in young Turkish population varies according to gender.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, H., KÖSEOĞLU, M., BAYINDIR, F. (2022). The evaluation of different smile parameters in the Turkish population. International Dental Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/539541

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Morley J, Eubank J. Macroestheticelements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc 2001
  2. 132(1):39-45. [Crossref] 2.Gill DS, Naini FB, Tredwin CJ. Smile aesthetics. Dent Update 2007
  3. 34(3):152-4, 157-8. [Crossref] 3.Sharma PK, Sharma P. Dental smile esthetics: The assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Seminars in Orthodontics 2012
  4. 18(3):193-201. [Crossref] 4.McLaren EA, Garber DA, Figueira J. The photoshop smilee design technique (part 1): digital dental photography. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013
  5. 34(10):772, 774, 776 passim. 5.McLaren EA, Rifkin R. Macroesthetics: facial and dentofacial analysis. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002
  6. 30(11):839-46. 6.McLaren EA, Tran Cao P. Smile analysis and esthetic design: "in the zone". Inside Dent. 2009
  7. 5(7):46-8. 7.Philips E. The classification of smile patterns. J Can Dent Assoc 1999
  8. 65(6):252-4. 8.Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, BrensingerCM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1998
  9. 1(1):2-11. [Crossref] 9.Kulak Ozkan Y, Akoglu Vanlıoglu B. Smile design in esthetic restoration. İstanbul: Vestiyer Pub. Group
  10. Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000 1996
  11. [Crossref] 11.Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001
  12. 120(2):98-111. [Crossref] 12.Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003
  13. 124(2):116-27. [Crossref] 13.Rubin LR. The anatomy of a smile: its importance in the treatment of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974
  14. 53(4):384-7. [Crossref] 14.Al-Johany SS, Alqahtani AS, Alqahtani FY, Alzahrani AH. Evaluation of different esthetic smile criteria. Int J Prosthodont 2011
  15. 24(1):64-70. 15.Yoon ME, JinTH, Dong JK. A study on the smile in Korean youth. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1992
  16. 30(2):259-71. 16.AlQahtani NA, Haralur SB, AlMaqbol M, AlMufarrij AJ, Al Dera AA, Al-Qarni M. Distribution of smile line, gingival angle and toothshape among the Saudi Arabian subpopulation and their association with gingival biotype. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016
  17. 6(Suppl 1):53-8. [Crossref]