Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of microhardness of newly developed glass carbomer-based dental filling material

Sayfa
58–62
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Heating the Fuji Triage™ during the initialsetting period significantly increased its physical strength after 24 hours.Conclusions: It was seen that microhardness of materials which used inour study was effected both time and heat.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study measured the microhardness of a newly developed glasscarbomer dental filling material within the first 24 hours after setting andcompared it against that of two different glass ionomers, with and withoutheating during setting, and a resin-modified glass ionomer.Methodology: Six cavities were prepared on acrylic resin discs.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:PMMAblocks were randomly divided into six groups of six cylinders and eachcavity was filled with one of the tested materials according to their group.The groups were: Group1, Fuji Triage™ with heat; Group 2, GCP Glass Fill™;Group 3, Equia™ with heat; Group 4, Riva LC™; Group 5, Fuji Triage™; andGroup 6, Equia™.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Heating the Fuji Triage™ during the initialsetting period significantly increased its physical strength after 24 hours.Conclusions: It was seen that microhardness of materials which used inour study was effected both time and heat.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: This study measured the microhardness of a newly developed glasscarbomer dental filling material within the first 24 hours after setting andcompared it against that of two different glass ionomers, with and withoutheating during setting, and a resin-modified glass ionomer.Methodology: Six cavities were prepared on acrylic resin discs. PMMAblocks were randomly divided into six groups of six cylinders and eachcavity was filled with one of the tested materials according to their group.The groups were: Group1, Fuji Triage™ with heat; Group 2, GCP Glass Fill™;Group 3, Equia™ with heat; Group 4, Riva LC™; Group 5, Fuji Triage™; andGroup 6, Equia™. Microhardness was measured by the Vickers hardnessscale using a microindentation hardness tester at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hoursafter initial setting of the materials.Results: Fuji Triage™ with heat applied during setting (Group 1) provedto be the hardest material, while Riva LC™ (Group 4) and GCP Glass Fill™(Group 2) were the softest. Heating the Fuji Triage™ during the initialsetting period significantly increased its physical strength after 24 hours.Conclusions: It was seen that microhardness of materials which used inour study was effected both time and heat.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTAN, H., MEŞE, A., KALE, E., ARSLANOĞLU, Z. (2022). Evaluation of microhardness of newly developed glass carbomer-based dental filling material. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 58–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/539532

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Faridia MA, Khabeerb A, Haroonc S. Flexural strength of glass carbomer cement and conventional glass ıonomer cement stored in different storage media over time. Med Princ Pract 2018;27:372–7. (Crossref
  2. Gorseta K, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Moshaverinia A, Glavina D, Lynch E. Effect of different thermo-light polymerization on flexural strength of two glass ionomer cements and a glass carbomer cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):102-7. (Crossref
  3. Wilson AD, Kent BE. The glass-ionomer cement: A new translucent dental filling material. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 1971;21:313. (Crossref
  4. Brito CR, Velasco LG, Bonini GA, Imparato JC, Raggio DP. Glass ionomer cement hardness after different materials for surface protection. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:243-6. (Crossref
  5. Tian F, Yap AU, Wang X, Gao X. Effect of staining solutions on color of pre-reacted glass-ionomer containing composites. Dent Mater J 2012;31:384-8. (Crossref
  6. Gönülol N, Özer S, Demirel N. Giomer yapıdaki akışkan kompozit ve adeziv sistemin Sınıf V kavitelerde mikrosızıntı açısından değerlendirilmesi. Microleakage evaluation of giomer flowable composites and adhesive systems in Class V cavities. Acta Odontol Turc 2014;31:18-22. (Crossref
  7. Mobarak E, Elsayad I, Ibrahim M, El-Badrawy W. Effect of LED light-curing on the relative hardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2009;34:65-71. (Crossref
  8. Klinge S, Kunstmann K, Frankenberger R, et al. Clinical behavior of viscous glass ionomer cement in classes I and II cavities. J Dent Res 1999;78:2285
  9. Lohbaer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? - properties, limitations and future trends. Materials 2010;3:76-96. (Crossref
  10. Lohbauer U, Kramer N, Siedsclag G, Schubert EW, Lauerer B, Müller FA, Petschelt A, Ebert J. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating. Am J Dent 2011;24:124-8
  11. Kuter B, Eden E, Yildiz H. The effect of heat on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013;14:90-4
  12. Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of heat application on the mechanical behaviour of glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:643-50. (Crossref
  13. Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2013;7:15-21
  14. Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PE. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of Class II co