Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

ProTaper Retreatment system versus balanced force technique for apical extrusion and gutta-percha removal

Sayfa
63–68
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The PTsystem caused less debris extrusion (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim was to compare root canal wall cleanliness, amounts ofapically extruded debris and irrigant during retreatment using theProTaper Universal Retreatment (PT) system or balanced force technique(BFT).Methodology: Root canals of extracted mandibular premolar teeth(n=44) were endodontically prepared and obturated, then the teeth weredivided into two groups: BFT and PT.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data wereanalyzed by Mann-Whitney U test.Results: The BFT and PT system provided similar degrees of canal wallcleanliness (p>0.05) and amounts of extruded irrigant (p>0.05).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The PTsystem caused less debris extrusion (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to compare root canal wall cleanliness, amounts ofapically extruded debris and irrigant during retreatment using theProTaper Universal Retreatment (PT) system or balanced force technique(BFT).Methodology: Root canals of extracted mandibular premolar teeth(n=44) were endodontically prepared and obturated, then the teeth weredivided into two groups: BFT and PT. Apically extruded material wascollected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes using the Myers andMontgomery method. The root halves were photographed under astereomicroscope. Area of the remnant filling material (coronal, middle,apical thirds and total canal surface) was measured by software. Data wereanalyzed by Mann-Whitney U test.Results: The BFT and PT system provided similar degrees of canal wallcleanliness (p>0.05) and amounts of extruded irrigant (p>0.05). The PTsystem caused less debris extrusion (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYAOĞLU, G., ALTUNKAYNAK, B., SARIÇAM, E. (2022). ProTaper Retreatment system versus balanced force technique for apical extrusion and gutta-percha removal. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/539524

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment--case selection and technique. Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod 1988;14(12):607-14. (Crossref
  2. Gordon MP. The removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealers from root canals. N Z Dent J 2005;101(2):44-52
  3. Barletta FB, Rahde Nde M, Limongi O, Moura AA, Zanesco C, Mazocatto G. In vitro comparative analysis of 2 mechanical techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73(1):65
  4. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod 2008;34(11):1370-3. (Crossref
  5. Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2007;33(9):1102- 05. (Crossref
  6. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer CH. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod 2008;34(4):466-9. (Crossref
  7. Tinaz AC, Alacam T, Uzun O, Maden M, Kayaoglu G. The effect of disruption of apical constriction on periapical extrusion. J Endod 2005;31(7):533-5. (Crossref
  8. Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza- Filho FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2001;34(5):354-8. (Crossref
  9. Al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 1995;21(3):154-8. (Crossref
  10. Topcuoglu HS, Akti A, Tuncay O, Dincer AN, Duzgun S, Topcuoglu G. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod 2014;40(12):2066-9. (Crossref
  11. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991;17(6):275-9. (Crossref
  12. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG, Jr. The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985;11(5):203-11. (Crossref
  13. Roggendorf MJ, Legner M, Ebert J, Fillery E, Frankenberger R, Friedman S. Micro-CT evaluation of residual material in canals filled with Activ GP or GuttaFlow following removal with NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2010;43(3):200-9. (Cross