Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

A micro-computed tomography evaluation of the change in volume of different bulk-fill composite materials caused by polymerization shrinkage

Sayfa
75–82
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that the volumetric gap caused by the polymerization shrinkage of the tested materials may be due to the structure of the material.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Composite resins contain different monomers and fillers that are directly affected by polymerization shrinkage.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, an accurate and reliable method is needed to measure the volume changes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that the volumetric gap caused by the polymerization shrinkage of the tested materials may be due to the structure of the material.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Composite resins contain different monomers and fillers that are directly affected by polymerization shrinkage. Therefore, an accurate and reliable method is needed to measure the volume changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of volume change associated with polymerization shrinkage in four different bulk-fill composite materials in class II restorations using a micro-CT device, which has high resolution and provides 3-dimensional images. Methodology: A total of 40 human 3rd molar teeth were used. First, standard class II cavities were opened on the mesial surfaces of all the teeth, and then the first micro-CT images were obtained. The same adhesive material was applied to all the teeth. The teeth were then separated into four groups, and a different bulk-fill composite was applied to each group; Filtek (FTK), X-tra Fil (XTF), Tetric Evo Ceram (TEC), and Filtek One (FLO) and the second micro-CT images were obtained. Then after polymerization of the materials, the final micro-CT images were taken, and analyses were made according to the scanning results. The Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U-tests were used in the statistical evaluation of the data. Results: The volumetric gap formed after polymerization of the composite resins was not determined to be statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: The volumetric difference (%) between the composite resin and the dental tissue following polymerization was seen to be greatest in XTF and least in FTK. It was concluded that the volumetric gap caused by the polymerization shrinkage of the tested materials may be due to the structure of the material.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Cangül, S., Adıgüzel, Ö., Sağmak, S., Evran, B. (2022). A micro-computed tomography evaluation of the change in volume of different bulk-fill composite materials caused by polymerization shrinkage. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 75–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/539508

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Shih WY (2016) Microleakage in different primary tooth restorations. J Chin Med Assoc 79:228–234. (Crossref
  2. Punathil S, Almalki SA, AlJameel AH, Gowdar IM, MC VA, Chinnari K (2019) Assessment of microleakage using dye penetration method in primary teeth restored with toothcolored materials: An in vitro study. The journal of contemporary dental practice 20:778-782. (Crossref
  3. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–32. (Crossref
  4. Garcia Mari L, Climent Gil A, Llena Puy C (2019) In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dental Materials journal 38: 721-727. (Crossref
  5. Behery H, El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Nabih S, Saleh B (2018) Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. Dental and Medical Problems 55:383-388. (Crossref
  6. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC (2003) Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in class V cavities. Am J Dent 16:239–243 7. Ersen KA, Gürbüz Ö, Özcan M (2019) Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography. Clinical Oral Investigations 1-7. (Crossref
  7. Krejci I, Planinic M, Stavridakis M, Bouillaguet S (2005) Resin composite shrinkage and marginal adaptation with different pulsedelay light curing protocols. Eur J Oral Sci 113:531–536. (Crossref
  8. Panduric V, Demoli N, Tarle Z, Sariri K, Mandic VN, Knezevic A, Sutalo J (2007) Visualization of marginal integrity of resinenamel interface by holographic interferometry. Oper Dent 32:266–272. (Crossref
  9. Neves AA, Jaecques S, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Lührs AK, Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B (2014) 3D-microleakage assessment of adhesive interfaces: exploratory findings by μCT. Dental Materials 30: 799-807. (Crossref
  10. Wang Z, Chiang MY (2016) Correlation between polymerization shrinkage stress and C-factor depends upon cavity compliance. Dental Materials 32:343-352. (Crossref
  11. Witzel MF, Ballester RY, Meira JBC, Lima RG, Braga RR (2007) Composite shrinkage stress as a function of specimen dimensions and compliance of the testing system. Dent Mater 23:204–10. (Crossref
  12. Gupta R, Tomer AK, Kumari A, Perle N, Chauhan P, Rana S (2017) Recent Advances in Bulkfill Flowable Composite Resins: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci., 3:79-81. 14.