Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Comparison of cyclic fatigue of a reciprocating file system at different angles of rotation

Sayfa
67–73
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the normally distributed groups (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Nickel-Titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary files (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) while operating root canals using in three different reciprocal angles.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methodology: Forty-five Reciproc R25 root canal files were tested using artificial canals with a 60° angle of curvature, 5 mm curvature radius, and 1.5 mm diameter carved into a stainless steel block.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the normally distributed groups (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Nickel-Titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary files (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) while operating root canals using in three different reciprocal angles. Methodology: Forty-five Reciproc R25 root canal files were tested using artificial canals with a 60° angle of curvature, 5 mm curvature radius, and 1.5 mm diameter carved into a stainless steel block. The Ni-Ti files were checked with a stereomicroscope and then randomly separated into three groups. Group 1 consisted of reciprocal angles CCW 150°— CW 30°, Group 2 consisted of CCW 180°—CW 60°, and Group 3 consisted of CCW 210°— CW 90°. The duration of the cyclic fatigue being measured, elapsed time until a file fractured was determined with a chronometer. The lengths of the fractured pieces were measured with a digital caliper. After the cyclic fatigue test, two samples from each group were examined with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to determine the signs of cyclic fatigue. Results: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the normally distributed groups (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKAY, S. E., AKAY, A., ADIGÜZEL, Ö., KAYA, S. (2022). Comparison of cyclic fatigue of a reciprocating file system at different angles of rotation. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 67–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/539453

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ruddle CJ. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Pathways of the Pulp 2002
  2. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296
  3. Haapasalo M, Shen Y. Evolution of nickel–titanium instruments: from past to future. Endodontic topics 2013;29(1):3-17. (Crossref
  4. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics 2009;35(11):1469-1476. (Crossref
  5. Ferreira F, Adeodato C, Barbosa I, Aboud L, Scelza P, Zaccaro Scelza M. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. International endodontic journal 2017;50(2):143-152. (Crossref
  6. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics 2013;39(2):258-261. (Crossref
  7. A Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes Jr DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of endodontics. 1997;23(2):77-85. (Crossref
  8. Karataş E, Arslan H, Büker M, Seçkin F, Çapar I. Effect of movement kinematics on the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel– titanium instruments. International Endodontic Journal 2016;49(4):361-364. (Crossref
  9. Saber SEDM, El Sadat SMA. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of WaveOne nickel-titanium instruments. Journal of Endodontics 2013;39(5):685-688. (Crossref
  10. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Gergi R, Culla A, De Angelis F, et al. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of endodontics 2012;38(10):1408-1411. (Crossref
  11. Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel–titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of endodontics 2007;33(10):1212-1216. (Crossref
  12. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, Huang X, Liu L. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 2007;33(3):276-279. (Crossref
  13. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MV, Siqueira Jr JF, Mangelli M, Lopes WS, et al. Fatigue life of Reciproc and Mtwo instruments subjected to static and dynamic tests. Journal of endodontics 2013;39(5):693-696. (Crossref
  14. Kim H-C, Kwak S-W, Cheung GS-P, Ko D-H, Chung S-M, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new n