Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

The comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of two different reciprocal files according to different access angles into the root canal

Sayfa
114–121
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When the groups were compared within one another, it was found that the increase in the root access angle decreases the cyclic fatigue resistance of the files (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Root canal preparation is one of the most important steps of root canal treatment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:One of the reasons may be the increase in the access angle.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When the groups were compared within one another, it was found that the increase in the root access angle decreases the cyclic fatigue resistance of the files (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Root canal preparation is one of the most important steps of root canal treatment. Preparation procedure includes disinfection and shaping protocols. Ni-Ti rotary file systems are usually used for shaping. The biggest disadvantage of the usage of Ni-Ti rotary file systems is that the file gets broken during the treatment. There are many reasons for the breakage of files. One of the reasons may be the increase in the access angle. The purpose of this study is to compare the cyclic fatigue of reciprocating Reciproc and WaveOne Gold rotary systems according to different angles of accessing the root canal of Ni-Ti files. Methodology: In our study, 90 root canal files were used, 45 of which is Reciproc R25 (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and the other 45 of which is WaveOne Gold Primary 25/07 (Dentsply, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Specially designed and manufactured stainless steel artificial roots whose curvature angle is 60° and curvature radius is 5 mm, which replicates the clinical conditions, were arranged. By enabling the files access the roots at 0°- 15°- 30° degrees, the lap numbers that they do till they break due to cyclic fatigue were examined. Results: When looking at the lap numbers that the Reciproc and WaveOne Gold root canal files do till they break, at accessing the roots at the same angles WaveOne Gold root canal file makes more lap numbers at all angles when compared with the Reciproc root canal file. Significant results were found when the groups were compared within one another and between groups and among all numeric data in the statistical analysis performed. It was also found that WaveOne Gold root canal file had more cyclic fatigue resistance. When the groups were compared within one another, it was found that the increase in the root access angle decreases the cyclic fatigue resistance of the files (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DUNDAR, M., ADIGÜZEL, Ö., KAYA, S. (2022). The comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of two different reciprocal files according to different access angles into the root canal. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 114–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/539438

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Bergenholtz G, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Reit C. Textbook of endodontology. John Wiley & Sons; 2013
  2. Carrotte P. Endodontics: Part 7 Preparing the root canal. British dental journal 2004;197(10):603-613. (Crossref
  3. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. Journal of endodontics 2004;30(8):559-567. (Crossref
  4. Eldeeb Me, Boraas JC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. International endodontic journal 1985;18(1):1-7. (Crossref
  5. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296
  6. Young G, Parashos P, Messer H. The principles of techniques for cleaning root canals. Australian dental journal 2007;52:S52- S63. (Crossref
  7. Peters OA, Paqué F. Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence International 2010;41(6)
  8. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodontic topics 2005;10(1):30-76. (Crossref
  9. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics 2009;35(11):1469-1476. (Crossref
  10. Thompson S. An overview of nickel–titanium alloys used in dentistry. International endodontic journal 2000;33(4):297- 310. (Crossref
  11. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of endodontics 1999;25(6):434- 440. (Crossref
  12. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, Huang X, Liu L. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. Journal of endodontics 2007;33(3):276-279. (Crossref
  13. Cheung G, Peng B, Bian Z, Shen Y, Darvell B. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. International endodontic journal 2005;38(11):802-809. (Crossref
  14. Al-Shekhli AAR, Al Aubi I. Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Different Rotary Endodontic File Systems. Journal of international dental & medical research 2020;13(3)
  15. Zafar MS. Impact of Endodontic Instrumentation on Surface Roughness of Various Nickel- Titanium Rotary Files. European journal of dentistry 2020. (Crossref
  16. Yared G, Alasmar Ramli G. Single file reciprocation: A literature review. Endodontic practice today 2013;7(3
  17. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes Jr DL. Cyclic fati