KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Insight Turkey / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 02

Reconsidering the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes in the Anthropocene

Yasemin KAYA
Sayfa
113–133
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Regimes can confront these challenges by adopting a holistic earth system perspective based on the integrity of socio-ecological systems and planetary boundaries.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Despite the increased number of International Environmental Regimes (IERs), gradually worsening environmental indicators have made the effectiveness of regimes a current and controversial issue.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Doubtlessly, regimes are one of the most significant tools of global environmental governance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Regimes can confront these challenges by adopting a holistic earth system perspective based on the integrity of socio-ecological systems and planetary boundaries.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Despite the increased number of International Environmental Regimes (IERs), gradually worsening environmental indicators have made the effectiveness of regimes a current and controversial issue. Doubtlessly, regimes are one of the most significant tools of global environmental governance. Enabling interstate cooperation, increasing knowledge about ecological problems, keeping these problems on the agenda, and providing relative improvement in some issue areas are the positive outcomes of regimes. However, IERs are institutions that are currently based on the stable and predictable earth system conditions of the Holocene Epoch. Therefore, IERs are unlikely to operate effectively under the unpredictable and unstable conditions of the new, Anthropocene era. Based on this argument, this article attempts to reveal that the effectiveness of regimes depends on their capacity to cope with the challenges of the Anthropocene. Regimes can confront these challenges by adopting a holistic earth system perspective based on the integrity of socio-ecological systems and planetary boundaries.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYA, Y. (2022). Reconsidering the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes in the Anthropocene. Insight Turkey, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 02, 113–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/539145

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Fiona Harvey, “Heatwaves at Both of Earth’s Poles Alarm Climate Scientists,” The Guardian, (March 20, 2022) retrieved March 30, 2022, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/20/ heatwaves-at-both-of-earth-poles-alarm-climate-scientists
  2. Paul J. Crutzen and Eugene F. Stoermer, “The Anthropocene,” IGBP Newsletter, Vol. 41, (2000), pp. 17- 18. 3. “International Environmental Agreements (IEA) Database Project,” University of Oregon, retrieved February 22, 2022, from
  3. Arild Underdal, “One Question, Two Answers,” in Edward L. Miles, et al., (eds.), Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001), pp. 3-45; Ronald B. Mitchell, “Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 6, No. 3 (2006), pp. 72-89
  4. Davor Vidas, Jan Zalasiewicz, and Mark Williams, “What Is the Anthropocene and Why Is It Relevant for International Law?” Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2015), pp. 3-23; Louise du Toit and Louis J. Kotzé, “Reimagining International Environmental Law for the Anthropocene: An Earth System Law Perspective,” Earth System Governance, Vol. 11, (2022), pp. 1-10
  5. Vidas, et al., “What Is the Anthropocene,” p. 20; Frank Biermann, “The Future of ‘Environmental’ Policy in the Anthropocene: Time for a Paradigm Shift,” Environmental Politics, Vol. 30, No. 1-2 (2021), p. 74, pp. 61-80
  6. Stephen D. Krasner, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, (London: Cornell University Press, 1991), pp. 1-21, p. 2
  7. Ernst B. Haas, “Words Can Hurt You: Or, Who Said What to Whom about Regimes?” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, (London: Cornell University Press, 1991), pp. 23-59, p. 27; Martin List and Volker Rittberger, “Regime Theory and International Environmental Management,” in Andrew Hurrell and Benedict Kingsbury (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 85-109
  8. Sofia Frantzi, “What Determines the Institutional Performance of Environmental Regimes? A Case Study of the Mediterranean Action Plan,” Marine Policy, No. 32 (2008), pp. 618-629; Gabriela Kütting, Environment, Society and International Relations: Towards More Effective International Environmental Agreements, (London: Routl