KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of the Oral Steroids, Macrolides and Combination Therapy in Nasal Polyposis Patients

Fatih TETİK
Arzu Yasemin KORKUT
Kerem Sami KAYA
Irmak UÇAK
İrfan ÇELEBİ
Berna Uslu COŞKUN
Sayfa
211–217
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The combined treatment may demonstrate significantly better resultsthan steroid treatment alone if larger studies with more patients are performed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: In this study, our aim was to compare oral steroid therapy with macrolide therapy and with oral steroid + macrolide(combine) therapy in patients with nasal polyposis (NP).Methods: All patients were treated with nasal steroid therapy for eight weeks and divided randomly into three groups as follows:Oral steroid group, oral macrolide group and combine group.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All patients underwent endoscopic staging, radiological grading,odour testing and completed the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire before and after treatment.Results: Significant improvement was observed in all parameters after treatment in all three groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The combined treatment may demonstrate significantly better resultsthan steroid treatment alone if larger studies with more patients are performed.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: In this study, our aim was to compare oral steroid therapy with macrolide therapy and with oral steroid + macrolide(combine) therapy in patients with nasal polyposis (NP).Methods: All patients were treated with nasal steroid therapy for eight weeks and divided randomly into three groups as follows:Oral steroid group, oral macrolide group and combine group. All patients underwent endoscopic staging, radiological grading,odour testing and completed the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire before and after treatment.Results: Significant improvement was observed in all parameters after treatment in all three groups. All parameters were significantlybetter in the combined group than in the macrolide group. Comparison of the oral steroid group and macrolide grouprevealed significantly better radiological grading and odour test changes for the oral steroid group, but no statistically significantdifferences existed according to endoscopic staging and SNOT-22. The post-treatment SNOT-22 score was significantly better inthe combined group than in the steroid group. A comparison of the combined and steroid groups showed better results for thecombined group for all parameters, but the differences were not significant.Conclusion: All treatment protocols were effective and the successful use of macrolide indicates its potential as an alternative inpatients with contraindications to oral steroid treatment. The combined treatment may demonstrate significantly better resultsthan steroid treatment alone if larger studies with more patients are performed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TETİK, F., KORKUT, A. Y., KAYA, K. S., UÇAK, I., ÇELEBİ, İ., COŞKUN, B. U. (2020). Comparison of the Oral Steroids, Macrolides and Combination Therapy in Nasal Polyposis Patients. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 211–217. https://ajindex.com/articles/363675

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Andrews AE, Bryson JM, Rowe-Jones JM. Site of origin of nasal polyps: relevance to pathogenesis and management. Rhinology 2005;43:180–4
  2. Sabirov A, Hamilton RG, Jacobs JB, Hillman DE, Lebowitz RA, Watts JD. Role of local immunoglobulin E specific for Alternaria alternata in the pathogenesis of nasal polyposis. Laryngoscope 2008;118:4–9
  3. Newton JR, Ah-See KW. A review of nasal polyposis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008;4:507–12
  4. Sarıoglu T, Bayar N, Kanbur B, Gündüz M. Treatment methods in recurrent nasal polyps. Drug and Treatment Journal 1993;6:12–4
  5. Erbek SS, Erbek S, Budakoğlu I, Cakmak O. The relationship between smoking and nasal polyposis. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2008;18:216–20
  6. Stammberger H. Rhinoscopic surgery. In: Settipane GA, Lund VJ, Bernstein JM, Tos M, editor. Nasal polyps: epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment. Rhode Island: Ocean Side Pub; 1997. p. 7–15
  7. Bachert C, Watelet JB, Gevaert P, Van Cauwenberge P. Pharmacological management of nasal polyposis. Drugs 2005;65:1537–52
  8. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012;50:1–12
  9. Lund VJ, Mackay IS. Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 1993;31:183–4
  10. Hancı D, Altun H, Şahin E, Altıntoprak N, Cingi C. Turkish translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22. ENT Updates 2015;5:51–7
  11. Kobayashi M, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM. A new clinical olfactory function test: cross-cultural influence. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:331–6
  12. Veyseller B, Ozucer B, Karaaltin AB, Yildirim Y, Degirmenci N, Aksoy F, et al. Connecticut (CCCRC) Olfactory Test: Normative Values in 426 Healthy Volunteers. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:31–4
  13. Schalek P, Petrás P, Klement V, Hahn A. Short-term antibiotics treatment in patients with nasal polyps and enterotoxins producing Staphylococcus aureus strains. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:1909–13
  14. Yamada T, Fujieda S, Mori S, Yamamoto H, Saito H. Macrolide treatment decreased the size of nasal polyps and IL-8 levels in nasal lavage. Am J Rhinol 2000;14:143–8
  15. Suzuki H, Shimomura A, Ikeda K, Oshima T, Takasaka T. Effects of long-term low-dose macrolide administration on neutrophil recruitment and IL-8 in the nasal discharge of chronic sinusitis patients. Tohoku J Exp Med 1997;182:115–24