Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

A Study on Accessibility of Disabled People: Case for Kızılay Shopping Center, Ankara

Sayfa
226–250
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The importance ofthis study is the answer to the question how accessible the social activityarea for all in Kızılay, which is developed as the central business area ofAnkara over the accessibility criteria according to legislation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Although legal arrangements have been made about accessibility inTurkey, their reflection the urban spaces have been inadequate.Accessibility is an issue that needs to handle at different scales toimprove the quality of life of every individual disabled or not.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It isamong the most important accessibility problems that the design of theplace with standard measures that will increase the accessibility ofindividuals is ignored.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The importance ofthis study is the answer to the question how accessible the social activityarea for all in Kızılay, which is developed as the central business area ofAnkara over the accessibility criteria according to legislation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Although legal arrangements have been made about accessibility inTurkey, their reflection the urban spaces have been inadequate.Accessibility is an issue that needs to handle at different scales toimprove the quality of life of every individual disabled or not. Analyzingmany studies, it is observed that the disabled people in the society havedifficulty in either inside of place or outside of place accessibility. It isamong the most important accessibility problems that the design of theplace with standard measures that will increase the accessibility ofindividuals is ignored. In order to draw attention to the planning anddesign criteria on the accessibility of place, it is aimed to determine theaccessibility of the space by analyzing compliance with standards inAnkara Kızılay shopping center case area. Within the scope of the study, accessibility criteria in the study area are evaluated by using anaccessibility monitoring and inspection form for buildings prepared bythe Ministry of Family and Social Policies General Directorate of Disabledand Elderly Services. As a result of the evaluation, it is revealed howaccessible the components that affect the availability of Kızılay AVM.According to this study, there is no usage area with very pooraccessibility level. Parking has poor accessibility level. The use ofemergency and building installation elements is at the medium level ofaccessibility. Perceptible walking surface signs and building entranceshave good accessibility levels. The other usage areas of the shoppingcenter are horizontal and vertical circulation in the building, toilets andorientation and markings are very well accessible. The importance ofthis study is the answer to the question how accessible the social activityarea for all in Kızılay, which is developed as the central business area ofAnkara over the accessibility criteria according to legislation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ULVİ, H. (2022). A Study on Accessibility of Disabled People: Case for Kızılay Shopping Center, Ankara. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 226–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/538314

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Arat, Y. and Sayar, G. (2016). Engelliler için Dolaşım Senaryosu “Konya Kent Plaza AVM Örneği”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 32 (2):1-17
  2. Arslan, F. and Bakır, N. (2010). “Tüketicilerin İlgilenim Düzeylerine Göre Alışveriş Merkezlerini Tercih Etme Nedenleri ve Sadakate Etkisi” Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(1), 227- 259. Arslantaş, A. Ş. and Güngör, C. (2014). “The Investigation of Municipal Buildings and Their Environments in Ankara with Regard to Turkish Standards Related with Accessibility” Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art, Humanities, Design and Planning, 2(2), 89-100.
  3. Bekci, B., 2012, “Fiziksel Engelli Kullanıcılar için en Uygun Ulaşım Akslarının Erişebilirlik Açısından İrdelenmesi: Bartın Kenti Örneği”, Bartın Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 14:26-36,
  4. Bartın Buldurur, M. A. and Yavaş, H. (2007). “Kentsel Mekanın Özürlülerce Kullanımının Değerlendirilmesi” Öz-Veri Dergisi, TC Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı, Ankara, 1(1), 911- 925. Çetin, B. A. (2018). “Alişveriş Merkezleri: Yeni Birer Kent Merkezi Olabilir Mi?”, Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(15): 13- 16 Engelliler için evrensel standartlar klavuzu https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/9260/mod _reso urce/content/0/engellil er-icin- evrenselstandartlar- kilavuzu.pdf Ergenoğlu, A. S. (2013). “Mimarlıkta Kapsayıcılık: Herkes İçin Tasarım”. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. pp.26-52
  5. Ergenoğlu, A. S. and Yıldız S. “Fiziksel Çevre ve Ulaşıma Erişilebilirlik.” Engelsiz Türkiye için: Yolun neresindeyiz? Mevcut durum ve Öneriler içinde (ed.) Sabancı Üniversitesi, 123-171. İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2009. Erişilebilirlik İzleme ve Denetleme Yönetmeliği, T.C. Resmi Gazete, 28713, 20 Temmuz 2013. Accessed on 10.01.2019 http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2013 /07/20130 720-9.htm Gezer, H. (2014). “Hastanelerde ve Sağlık Merkezlerinde Erişilebilirlik” İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(2): 113-133
  6. Güngör, C. (2013). “An Evaluation of Gazi University Faculty of Architecture Buildings with Regard to Turkish Standards Related with Accecibility for People with Disabilities” Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art, Humanities, Design and Planning, 1(1), 1-14.
  7. Kaplan, H. (2013). “Bağımsız Hareket İçin Yapılı Çevrede Düzenlemeler”, Düzenlemeler, B. H. İ. Y. Ç., Paneli, B. H. B. B., and Çalıştayı, A. R., pp.9-26
  8. Kaplan, H., Yüksel, Ü., Gültekin, B., Güngör, C., Karasu, N., a