Multi-Criteria Evaluation by Means of Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Transportation Master Plans: Scenario Selection in the Transportation Master Plan of Ankara
The effectiveness of mathematical model,which is set up in the selection processes, is discussed in particular with respect to the Ankararegion and the prospective estimates and results are evaluated depending on the selectedalternative.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Transportation Master Plan, includes the processes of producing, election and evaluatingprocess for scenarios that can respond to transportation problems.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this election process, ascenario should be selected by a scientific method as transportation plan from among thedetermined alternatives.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The effectiveness of mathematical model,which is set up in the selection processes, is discussed in particular with respect to the Ankararegion and the prospective estimates and results are evaluated depending on the selectedalternative.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
The Transportation Master Plan, includes the processes of producing, election and evaluatingprocess for scenarios that can respond to transportation problems. In this election process, ascenario should be selected by a scientific method as transportation plan from among thedetermined alternatives. This study explains in details how inter-scenario selection criteria aredetermined by using the analytic hierarchy process that is a multi-criteria evaluation method intransportation master plan implementation processes. The effectiveness of mathematical model,which is set up in the selection processes, is discussed in particular with respect to the Ankararegion and the prospective estimates and results are evaluated depending on the selectedalternative.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
ULVİ, H., DÜZKAYA, H., ORMAN, A., AKDEMİR, F. (2022). Multi-Criteria Evaluation by Means of Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Transportation Master Plans: Scenario Selection in the Transportation Master Plan of Ankara. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 381–397. https://ajindex.com/articles/521399
Haghshenas, H., Vaziri, M., “Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison”, Ecological Indicators, 15(1): 115-121, (2012).
Snyder, L.V., “Facility location under uncertainty: A review”, IIE Transactions, 38: 537–555, (2006).
Van Wee, B., Handy, S., “Key research themes on urban space, scale and sustainable urban mobility”, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1): 18-24, (2016).
Banister, D., Anderton, K., Bonilla, D., Givoni, M., Schwanen, T., “Transportation and the environment”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36: 247-270, (2011).
Santos, G., Behrendt, H., Teytelboym, A., “Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport”, Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1): 46-91, (2010).
Zuidgeest, M., van Maarseveen, M., “Transportation planning for sustainable development. Transport for the New Millenium”, Proceedings of the South African Transportation Conference, South Africa, (2000).
Edward, A., Mierzejewski, P.E., “A new strategic urban transportation planning process”, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, (1995).
Macharis, C., Bernardini, A., “Reviewing the use of multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach”, Transport Policy, 37: 177-186, (2014).
De Brücker, K., Macharis, C., Verbeke, A., “Multi-criteria analysis in transport project evaluation: An institutional approach”, European Transport, 47: 3-24, (2011).
Schutte, I.C., Brits, A., “Prioritising transport infrastructure projects: Towards a multi-criterion analysis”, Southern African Business Review, 16(3): 97-117, (2012).
Chen, C.T., “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1): 1-9, (2000).
Kopytov, E., Abramov, D., “Multiple-criteria analysis and choice of transportation alternatives in multimodal freight transport system”, Transport and Telecommunication, 13(2): 148-158, (2012).
Macharis, C., De Witte, A., Ampe, J., “The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 43(2): 183-202, (2008).
Keyvan-Ekbatani, M., Cats, M., “Multi-criteria appraisal of multi-modal urban public transport systems”, 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, Delft-The Netherlands, (2015).
Majumder, M., “Multi Criteria Decision Making, Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Clima