Dergiler / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Examining the Relationship Between Enclosure Ratio of Street and Skyline’s Complexity

Sayfa
851–873
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study offered an objective and perceptual evaluation approach for examining the street’s enclosure ratio.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The urban design criteria significantly affect the visual quality of space.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Design/Methodology/Approach According to the study's hypothesis, as the street's enclosure ratio increases, the street skyline's complexity level decreases.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study offered an objective and perceptual evaluation approach for examining the street’s enclosure ratio.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The urban design criteria significantly affect the visual quality of space. Enclosure and Complexity can be defined as two crucial urban design principles that affect the perceptibility and visual quality of space. This study aimed to offer an objective and perceptual evaluation method in assessing the street’s enclosure ratio. In the study, the street's enclosure ratio was evaluated via the street skyline's complexity. Design/Methodology/Approach According to the study's hypothesis, as the street's enclosure ratio increases, the street skyline's complexity level decreases. For testing this hypothesis, the street images were selected from the London and Chicago cities. Firstly, the skylines of the streets were determined on images, and then, the fractal dimensions of skylines were calculated. Then, the street’s enclosure ratio and the factors that affect street skyline's fractal dimension were measured with a defined measurement system. Subsequently, the relationship between the street’s enclosure ratio and calculated street skyline's fractal dimensions was examined by regression analysis. Findings As a result, it was determined that there is an inverse relationship between the street’s enclosure ratio and the street skyline’s fractal dimensions. As the enclosure ratio increases, the complexity of the skyline decreases. The decrease in the complexity level of the skyline weakens the visual quality and perceptibility of the street. Research Limitations In this study, the perceptual evaluation of the street’s enclosure ratio was examined with an objective method. This method can also be reinforced with a subjective evaluation and more precise results can be obtained. Social Implications The obtained results can provide important clues to increase the visual quality and perceptibility of the streets. In perceptible spaces with high visual quality, feelings such as liking, trust, belonging and comfort develop in people. Originality/Value The fractal approach as an objective method is used widely for perceptual evaluation of the complexity level in cities. However, it was determined that very few studies examined the street’s enclosure ratio with the perceptual and objective evaluation method. Perceptual evaluations of the enclosure were generally made with subjective methods. This study offered an objective and perceptual evaluation approach for examining the street’s enclosure ratio.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akbarishahabi, L. (2022). Examining the Relationship Between Enclosure Ratio of Street and Skyline’s Complexity. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 851–873. https://ajindex.com/articles/538246

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Akdağ, S. G., & Bostancı, S. H. (2013). The Impacts of Prestıge Projects on The Skyline of Istanbul. International Journal of Architectural Research, Archnet-IJAR, 7(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26687/ARCHNET-IJAR.V7I2.170
  2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction a Pattern Language. Oxford University Press.
  3. Altaban, Ö. (2013). From Town Planning to Urban Design Work-The Dimensions to be Considered. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture, 1(1), 2–21.
  4. Aslan, F., & Atik, A. (2015). Perceptions About Commercial advertising Signs on Street Landscape and shopping Preferences: The sample of Kisla Street, Malatya- Turkey. American Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 129–140.
  5. Barratt, K. (1980).
  6. Logic and Design, Revised: In Art, Science, and Mathematics. The Pitman Press.
  7. Batty, M., & Longley, P. (1994). Labratories for Visualizing Urban Form. In Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function (pp. 130–163).
  8. Academic Press Limited. Berlyne, D. E. (1970).
  9. Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212593
  10. Blizek, W., & Berlyne, D. E. (1973). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.2307/429334
  11. Bostancı, S. H., & Ocakçi, M. (2011). Innovative Approach to Aesthetic Evaluation Based on Entropy. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548473
  12. Bostancı, S. H., & Oral, M. (2017). Experimental Approach on the Cognitive Perception of Historical Urban Skyline. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture & Planning Received, 5, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2017.25-E-ISSN
  13. Burden, E. (1994). Elements of Architectural Design: A Visual Resource. Wiley. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places- Urban Spaces; The Dimensions of Urban Design. Architectural Press.
  14. Chalup, S. K., Henderson, N., Ostwald, M. J., & Wiklendt, L. (2009). Architectural Science Review a Computational Approach to Fractal Analysis of a Cityscape’s Skyline. Taylor & Francis, 52(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2009.0015
  15. Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Architecture: Form, Space, & Order. Wiley. Cooper, J. (2003). Fractal Assessment of Street-Level Skylines a Possible Means of Assessing and Comparing Character. Urban Morphology, 7(2), 73–82.
  16. Cooper, J., & Oskrochi, R. (2008). Fractal Analysis of S