KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

THE ROLE OF SYMBOLIC ARCHITECTURE ON AESTHETIC JUDGMENT: A CROSS-CULTURAL INVESTIGATION ON THE PERCEPTION OF AFRICAN “CALABASH” FIGURE

Ayşe Tekel
Kemal Yıldırım
Leila AKbarishahabi
Bassirou Bande
Sayfa
525–536
Yayın Tarihi
2016-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

After giving information about the deep meaning of these structures and the place occupied by the calabash in the African culture, the Turkish participants were also impressed and contrary to their previous evaluation, their aesthetic liking rates increased and approached the judgment levels of the Africans.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main purpose of this study was to examine the viewer’s opinion about aesthetic judgment related to the individual feeling that is transferred through the designed object to the viewer and that shows the effects of cultural differences on aesthetic judgment by comparing the liking rates of African and Turkish participants on various symbolic structures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the results, there were differences between the liking rates of African and Turkish participants: African laypersons as well as architects were impressed by symbolic structures and their cultural effects and they evaluated these three structures to be more impressive than the Turkish participants.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:After giving information about the deep meaning of these structures and the place occupied by the calabash in the African culture, the Turkish participants were also impressed and contrary to their previous evaluation, their aesthetic liking rates increased and approached the judgment levels of the Africans.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Symbolic Architecture · Aesthetic Judgment · Calabash

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to examine the viewer’s opinion about aesthetic judgment related to the individual feeling that is transferred through the designed object to the viewer and that shows the effects of cultural differences on aesthetic judgment by comparing the liking rates of African and Turkish participants on various symbolic structures. Two groups of participants were selected for this study: African professionals (architects, planners and urban designers) and laypersons who had information about African culture and its effect on design elements. Another group was Turkish architects and laypersons who did not have any information about African culture and its effect on design elements. As a very important cultural value in Africa, the “Calabash” was used as the reference. Three architectural structures were used that have been designed with reference to the “Calabash”. According to the results, there were differences between the liking rates of African and Turkish participants: African laypersons as well as architects were impressed by symbolic structures and their cultural effects and they evaluated these three structures to be more impressive than the Turkish participants. After giving information about the deep meaning of these structures and the place occupied by the calabash in the African culture, the Turkish participants were also impressed and contrary to their previous evaluation, their aesthetic liking rates increased and approached the judgment levels of the Africans.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tekel, A., Yıldırım, K., AKbarishahabi, L., Bande, B. (2016). THE ROLE OF SYMBOLIC ARCHITECTURE ON AESTHETIC JUDGMENT: A CROSS-CULTURAL INVESTIGATION ON THE PERCEPTION OF AFRICAN “CALABASH” FIGURE. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 525–536. https://ajindex.com/articles/254696

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Göğebakan, Y., Estetik ve kentsel yapılanma üzerindeki etkisi (Aesthetics and its effect on urban structure), İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 2012;2 (4):73-84 (in Turkish). Berleant, A., The aesthetic field: a phenomenology of aesthetic experience, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1971;30(1):125-128.
  2. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P., Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004;8(4):364-382.
  3. Lounsbury, C.R., Architecture and cultural history, in M.C. Beaudry, D Hicks, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  4. Kopec, D., Lord, N., Scares of Communism: architectural and design remnants of an ideology, Space and Culture, 2010;13(4):436-454.
  5. Seligmann, K., Seligmann, C., Architecture and language: notes on a metaphor. Journal of Architectural Education, 1977;30(4):23-27.
  6. Pultar, M. A conceptual framework for values in the built environment, IAPS 14 Book of Proceedings. Proceedings of the IAPS 14 Conference, Stockholm, July 31 - August 3, 1996.
  7. Flores Fratto, T., Undefining art: irrelevant categorization in the anthropology of aesthetics, Dialectical Anthropology, 1978;3(2):129-138.
  8. Smith, L., Munzenrider, C., Raphael, B., Bakker, K, Cultural aesthetics and conservation in New Mexico, Waac Newsletter, 1993;15(1):23-26.
  9. Bishop, A.R., Outside the square? Aesthetic response to the contemporary architecture of Federation Environmentalist, 2007;27(1):63-72.
  10. Melbourne, The Berleant, A., The idea of a cultural aesthetic, Dialogue and Universalism, 2003;13 (11-12):113- 122. John, E., Art and knowledge, in B. Gaut and D. Lopes (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, London: Routledge, 2001; 329-352.
  11. Gagliardi, P., Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life, in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (eds.) Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage; 1996.
  12. Bamossy, G., Scammon D.L., Johnston, M., A preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of an aesthetic judgment test, in R.P. Bagozzi, A.M. Tybout (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 1993;10:685-690.
  13. Arnheim, R., Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1974.
  14. Berlyne, D.E., Studies in the new experimental aesthetics, New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1974.
  15. Cuthbert, A.R., The form o