Dergiler / Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Thermal Behaviour of Residential Buildings with Cantilever Beams under Winter Boundary Conditions

Sayfa
155–164
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This decrease in themean Nu number is evident for Ra≤104, but it appears to be more pronounced after Ra=105.To have minimum heat loss from a residential building under winter day boundary conditions,it is suggested that the ratio of d/H should be between 0.2 and 0.5.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the thermal behaviour of residential buildings with cantilever beam underwinter boundary conditions was numerically investigated by means of the open-endedstructure approach.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Analyses were conducted for Rayleighnumbers in the range of 103 to 106.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This decrease in themean Nu number is evident for Ra≤104, but it appears to be more pronounced after Ra=105.To have minimum heat loss from a residential building under winter day boundary conditions,it is suggested that the ratio of d/H should be between 0.2 and 0.5.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, the thermal behaviour of residential buildings with cantilever beam underwinter boundary conditions was numerically investigated by means of the open-endedstructure approach. For this purpose, parametric studies were carried out for various ratiosof cantilever beam depth/cantilever beam height (d/H) and Rayleigh numbers using a computerprogram for no wind laminar flow conditions. Analyses were conducted for Rayleighnumbers in the range of 103 to 106. The calculations were carried out for the ratios of d/H,namely 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. The working fluid was treated as air (Pr=0.71). Accordingto the findings, the mean Nu number along with the outer vertical wall (surfaceL) of the residential building, in general, decreases as d/H increases. This decrease in themean Nu number is evident for Ra≤104, but it appears to be more pronounced after Ra=105.To have minimum heat loss from a residential building under winter day boundary conditions,it is suggested that the ratio of d/H should be between 0.2 and 0.5.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAMLI, L. (2022). Thermal Behaviour of Residential Buildings with Cantilever Beams under Winter Boundary Conditions. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 155–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/538039

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Raithby GD, Hollands KGT. Natural convection, in: Rohsenow WM, Harnett JP, Ganic EN, (Eds.), Handbook of Heat Transfer Fundamentals. second ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985 (Chapter 6). Ostrach O. Natural convection in enclosure, Journal of Heat Transfer 110 (1988) 1175-1190.
  2. Tavares MCP, Goncalves HJP, Bastos JNTFC. The glazing area in residential buildings in temperate climate: The thermal-energetic performance of housing units in Lisbon. Energy and Buildings 140 (2017) 280–294.
  3. Aimee Byrne A, Byrne G, O’Donnell G, Robinson A. Case studies of cavity and external wall insulation retrofitted under the Irish home energy saving scheme: Technical analysis and occupant perspectives. Energy and Buildings 130 (2016) 420–433.
  4. Magalhaes SMC, Leal VMS, Horta IM. Modelling the relationship between heating energy use and indoor temperatures in residential buildings through artificial neural networks considering occupant behavior. Energy and Buildings 151 (2017) 332–343.
  5. Yousefi F, Gholipour Y, Yan W. A study of the impact of occupant behaviors on energy performance of building envelopes using occupants’ data. Energy and Buildings 148 (2017) 182–198.
  6. Jin X, Medina MA, Zhang X. On the placement of a phase change material thermal shield within the cavity of buildings walls for heat transfer rate reduction. Energy 73 (2014) 780-786.
  7. Sorgato MJ, Melo AP, Lamberts R. The effect of window opening ventilation control on residential building energy consumption. Energy and Buildings 133 (2016) 1–13.
  8. Selamet EE, Arpaci VS, Borgnakke C. Simulation of laminar buoyancy-driven flows in an enclosure. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A 22 (1992) 401-420.
  9. Chan YL, Tien CL. A numerical study of two-dimensional natural convection in square open cavities. Numerical Heat Transfer 8 (1985) 65-80.
  10. Vafai K, Ettefagh J. The effect of sharp corners on buoyancy-driven flows with particular emphasis on outer boundaries. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 33 (1990) 2311-2328.
  11. Vafai K, Ettefagh J. Thermal and fluid flow instabilities in buoyancy-driven flows in open-ended cavities. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 33 (1990) 2329-2344.
  12. Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightston M. Mixed convection heat transfer in two-dimensional open-ended enclosures. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 5171-5190.
  13. Elsayed MM, Chakroun W. Effects of aperture geometry on heat transfer in tilted partially open cavities. Journal of Heat Transfer 121 (1990) 819-827.
  14. Khanafer K, Vafai K