KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE OF TRANSITION ECONOMIES IN THE POST-COLD WAR PERIOD

Hakan MIHCI
Sayfa
21–42
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is particularly true for CEEC.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present study attempts to assess human development performance of the transition economies by dividing the countries into two major categories as Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) to identify the necessary means for achieving higher levels of development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the main finding of the paper, human development performance of the transition economies is not disappointing at the aggregate level.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is particularly true for CEEC.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kalkınma · insani kalkınma · insani kalkınma endeksi

Özet

The present study attempts to assess human development performance of the transition economies by dividing the countries into two major categories as Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) to identify the necessary means for achieving higher levels of development. For this aim, a comparative descriptive analysis is used. The analysis period covers the last two decades. According to the main finding of the paper, human development performance of the transition economies is not disappointing at the aggregate level. In particular, CEEC performed quite well during the transition period. In comparison with CEEC, Human Development Index values of CIS remained at relatively low levels. However, when the developing countries are concerned, human development performance of CIS is promising in relation to their per capita income levels. The main factors of human development favor women rather than men in transition economies except income. Furthermore, an improvement is observed towards the eradication of human poverty and maintaining of the equal distribution of income in the case of transition economies. This is particularly true for CEEC.

Abstract

The present study attempts to assess human development performance ofthe transition economies by dividing the countries into two major categories asCentral and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) and Commonwealth ofIndependent States (CIS) to identify the necessary means for achieving higherlevels of development. For this aim, a comparative descriptive analysis is used.The analysis period covers the last two decades.According to the main finding of the paper, human developmentperformance of the transition economies is not disappointing at the aggregatelevel. In particular, CEEC performed quite well during the transition period. Incomparison with CEEC, Human Development Index values of CIS remained atrelatively low levels. However, when the developing countries are concerned,human development performance of CIS is promising in relation to their percapita income levels.The main factors of human development favor women rather than men intransition economies except income. Furthermore, an improvement is observedtowards the eradication of human poverty and maintaining of the equaldistribution of income in the case of transition economies. This is particularlytrue for CEEC.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MIHCI, H. (2022). HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE OF TRANSITION ECONOMIES IN THE POST-COLD WAR PERIOD. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 21–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/533139

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Adam, F., M. Makarovic, B. Roncevic and M. Tomsic (2004) The Challenges of Sustained Development: The Role of Socia-Cultural Factors in East Central Europe, Budapest/New York: Central Euroepan University Press.
  2. Aslund, A. (2002) Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Barder, O. (2006) “A Policymaker’s Guide to Dutch Disease: What is Dutch Disease, and is it a Problem?”, Center for Global Development Working Paper, No. 91. Becker, C.M. and D.S. Urzhumova (2005) “Mortality Recovery and Stabilization in Kazakhstan 1995-2001, Economics and Human Biology, 3, 97-122.
  4. Brada, J.C. and A.M. Kutan (1999) “The End of Moderate Inflation in Three Transition Economies?” The Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis Working Paper Series, No.99-003.
  5. Brainerd, E. (2001) “Economic Reform and Mortality in the Former Soviet Union: a Study of the Suicide Epidemic in the 1990s”, European Economic Review, 45, 1007-1119.
  6. Brainerd, E. and D.M. Cutler (2004) “Autopsy on an Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union”, NBER Working Paper, No. 10868. Cotarelli, C. and P. Doyle (1999) Disinflation in Transition, 1993-97,
  7. Washington, DC: IMF. Cotarelli, C. and G. Szapary (1998) Moderate Inflation: The Experience of Transition Economies, Washington, DC: IMF. Dabrowski, M. (2003) Disinflation in Transition Economies: Experience of the Economies in Transition, Central European University Press. EBRD [European Bank for Reconstruction and Development] (2003) Transition Report 2003, London: EBRD. Faccini, G. and M.L. Segnana (2003) “Growth at the EU Periphery: the Next Enlargement”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43, 827- 862. Fidrmuc, J. and K. Gerxhani (2008) “Mind the Gap Social Capital, East and West”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 264-286.
  8. Ghosh, A.R. (1997) “Inflation in Transition Economies: How Much? And Why?”, IMF Working Paper, No. 97/80, Washington, DC: IMF. Gros, D. and M. Suhrcke (2000) “Ten Years after: What is Special about Transition Countries”, Aussenwirtschaft, 56, 201-224.
  9. Hayo, B. (2007) “Happiness in Transition: An Empirical Study on Eastern Europe”, Economic Systems, 31, 204-221.
  10. IMF (2000); Transition Economies: An IMF Perspective on Progress and Prospects. Accession date: 12 August 2010.
  11. Kalediene, R. and J. Petrauskiene (2004) “Socio-economic Transition, Inequality, and Mortality in Lithuania”, Economics and Human Biology, 2, 87-95.
  12. Klugman, J., J. Micklewigh