Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Two Different Simulation Modalities in Environmental Safety Teaching for Stroke Patients on Nursing Students’ Stress, Self-Confidence and Satisfaction

Sayfa
48–56
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was determined that usage of simulation in environmental safety teaching for stroke patients was found to cause stressin students, but being well organized was effective in stressmanagement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim:This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of two differentsimulationmodalitiesusedinenvironmentalsafety teachingforstrokepatientsonself-confidence,satisfaction, knowledge scores and stress perception in nursing students.MaterialandMethods: Thestudydesignwasrandomized controlled, pre-post-test, mixed-method design.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The students practicing with mannequin formedthecontrolgroupandthosepracticingwiththe standardized patient formed theexperimental group (mannequin group: n=31 and standardized patient group: n=31).Results: Satisfaction and self-confidence scores of the students in standardized patient group were higher than the mannequin group and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.01; p=0.04).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was determined that usage of simulation in environmental safety teaching for stroke patients was found to cause stressin students, but being well organized was effective in stressmanagement.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim:This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of two differentsimulationmodalitiesusedinenvironmentalsafety teachingforstrokepatientsonself-confidence,satisfaction, knowledge scores and stress perception in nursing students.MaterialandMethods: Thestudydesignwasrandomized controlled, pre-post-test, mixed-method design. Sixty-two students participated in the study. The students practicing with mannequin formedthecontrolgroupandthosepracticingwiththe standardized patient formed theexperimental group (mannequin group: n=31 and standardized patient group: n=31).Results: Satisfaction and self-confidence scores of the students in standardized patient group were higher than the mannequin group and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.01; p=0.04). No significant difference was found between pre-test and post-test scores between the two groups in terms of knowledge levels (p> 0.05).However,in-groupcomparison,therewas asignificant difference between the pre and post-test scores of the students in the mannequin group. Stress perceptions of the students were analyzed under two main themes: sources of stress and stress management.Conclusions: Standardizedpatientsimulationincreasesthe satisfaction and self-confidence ofthe students. However, it was found that both simulation modalities did not make a difference in terms of students’ knowledge level. It was determined that usage of simulation in environmental safety teaching for stroke patients was found to cause stressin students, but being well organized was effective in stressmanagement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATEŞ, E., ÜNVER, V., ULUS, B. (2022). Effect of Two Different Simulation Modalities in Environmental Safety Teaching for Stroke Patients on Nursing Students’ Stress, Self-Confidence and Satisfaction. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 48–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/532703

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Kamalakannan S, Gudlavalleti ASV, Gudlavalleti VSM, Goenka S, Kuper H. Incidence & prevalence of stroke in India: A systematic review. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2017
  2. 146(2):175. 2.Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Franceschini M, Bovis F, Cecconi L, Pournajaf S, et al. Impact of acute-phase complications and interventions on 6-month survival after stroke. A prospective observational study. Plos One. 2018
  3. 13(3):e0194786. 3.Bentes C, Martins H, Peralta AR, Casimiro C, Morgado C, Franco AC, et al. Post-stroke seizures are clinically underestimated. Journal of Neurology. 2017
  4. 264(9):1978-85. 4.Sendir M, Dogan P. Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyonun kullanımı: sistematik inceleme. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2015
  5. 23(1):49-56. 5.Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Bellchambers H, Fernandez R. Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2010
  6. 6(6):207-22. 6.Laschinger S, Medves J, Pulling C, McGraw R, Waytuck B, Harrison MB, et al. Effectiveness of simulation on health profession students' knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction. International Journal of Evidence‐Based Healthcare. 2008
  7. 6(3):278-302. 7.Kneebone R, Kidd J, NestelD, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education. 2002
  8. 36(7):628-34. 8.Hravnak M, Beach M, Tuite P. Simulator technology as a tool for education in cardiac care. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2007
  9. 22(1):16-24. 9.Kim JK, Dotson B, Thomas S, Nelson KC. Standardized patient identification and specimen labeling: a retrospective analysis on improving patient safety. Journal of the American Academyof Dermatology. 2013
  10. 68(1):53-6. 10.Pfeiffer CA, Palley JE, Harrington KL. Impact of the Site Specialty of a Continuity Practice on Students' Clinical Skills: Performance With Standardized Patients. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2010
  11. 22(3):191-5. 11.Robinson-Smith G, Bradley PK, Meakim C. Evaluating the use of standardized patients in undergraduate psychiatric nursing experiences. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2009
  12. 5(6):203-11. 12.Daniels K, Arafeh J, Clark A, Waller S, Druzin M, Chueh J. Prospective randomized trial of simulation versus didactic teaching for obstetrical emergencies. Simulation in Healthcare. 2010
  13. 5(1):40-5. 13.Becker KL, Rose LE, Berg JB, Park H, Shatzer JH. The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients. Journal of