KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

Formal and Informal Organization Structure’ Social Network Analysis: An Example of Advice and Trust Networks

Zeynep EREN
Sayfa
1121–1142
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A total of 45 cliques have been identified within the network, the smallest one consisting of 3.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main purpose of this study is to put forward the advice asking networks in an educational organization, compare the formal structure and the informal structure, identify the position of appointed leaders in the network within the social network, the divisions within the network and the informal leaders.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study which is of survey model has been conducted at a higher-education organization in Turkey during the 2014-2015 academic year through the social network analysis approach.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A total of 45 cliques have been identified within the network, the smallest one consisting of 3.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2014-2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to put forward the advice asking networks in an educational organization, compare the formal structure and the informal structure, identify the position of appointed leaders in the network within the social network, the divisions within the network and the informal leaders. This study which is of survey model has been conducted at a higher-education organization in Turkey during the 2014-2015 academic year through the social network analysis approach. In the study, the main data of the analysis has been collected from the web site of the organization and through the semi-structured interview method. Data collected from 41 participants has been analyzed with UCINET 6.0 and presented visually in the graphics. According to the findings of the study, in the formal structure 41 actors and 102 connections, and in the informal structure 46 actors and 424 connections have been identified. The findings revealed that only 4 of the appointed administrators are informal leaders as well within the network. A total of 45 cliques have been identified within the network, the smallest one consisting of 3.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EREN, Z. (2022). Formal and Informal Organization Structure’ Social Network Analysis: An Example of Advice and Trust Networks. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 1121–1142. https://ajindex.com/articles/532198

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Aydın, M. (2007). Eğitim yönetimi. (8. baskı). Ankara:
  2. Hatipoğlu Yayınları.
  3. Baker, H. K. (1981). Tapping into the power of informal groups. Supervisory Management, 26, 2, 18‒25. Balcı, A. (2005). Açıklamalı eğitim yönetimi terimleri sözlüğü. (2. baskı). Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Barabasi, A.L. (2010). Bağlantılar. İstanbul:
  5. Optimist Yayınları.
  6. Barnes, J. (1954). Class and commities in Norwegian island parish. Human Relations. 7, 39‒58. Bess, K. D.; Paul W. Speer, P.W. &. Perkins, D.D. (2012). Ecological contexts in the development of coalitions for youth violence prevention: An organizational network analysis. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 5, 526‒537. Borgatti, S.P. (2002).
  7. Netdraw network visualization, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA. Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.B. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management. 29, 6, 991‒1013. Borgatti, S.P.; Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET for windows, version 6.59: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. (9. baskı). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Yayıncılık. Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Castells, M. (2008). Ağ toplumunun yükselişi, enformasyon çağı: Ekonomi, toplum ve kültür. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  10. Chiristakis, N.A. ve Fowler, J.H. (2012). Sosyal ağların şaşırtıcı gücü ve yaşantımızı biçimlendiren etkisi. İstanbul:
  11. Varlık Yayınları.
  12. Cobb, A. T. (1986). Informal influence in the formal organization: psychological and situational correlates. Group and Organization Studies, 11, 3, 229‒253. Coleman, J. S. (1961). Adolescent society. NY: Free Press.
  13. Crampton, S. M., & Hodge, J. W. (1998). The informal communication network: Factors influencing grapevine activity. Public Personnel Management, 27, 4, 569‒584. Cross, R. & Cummings, J.N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 6, 928‒937. Cross, J.E.; Dickman, E.; Newman-Gonchar, R. & Fagan, J. M. (2009). Using mixed-method design and network analysis to measure development of interagency collaboration. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 310‒329. Cross, R. ve Parker, A. (2004). Sosyal şebekelerin saklı gücü. İstanbul:
  14. Henkel Yayıncılık. Cummings, J. N. & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performan