Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

From Shared Interaction to Shared Language: Learning a Second Language in an Immersion Kindergarten

Sayfa
197–214
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The focus of the study are the learning processes, but the products of learning are also in evidence, and manifested in the ways the children show understanding of the second language and how they use it

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The article focuses on second language learning in an immersion kindergarten.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Within the framework of conversation analysis, the study explores how learning is situated in interaction and evidenced in the participants’ verbal and embodied behavior.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The focus of the study are the learning processes, but the products of learning are also in evidence, and manifested in the ways the children show understanding of the second language and how they use it
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The article focuses on second language learning in an immersion kindergarten. Within the framework of conversation analysis, the study explores how learning is situated in interaction and evidenced in the participants’ verbal and embodied behavior. The data consist of videotaped everyday interaction of a group of Finnish-speaking children during their first two years of Swedish immersion. The children’s emerging second language competences are explored by analyzing how they respond to the educator’s questions and directives. The production of Swedish is investigated by analyzing how the children recycle lexical items and syntactic structures that the educator has used. In terms of second language understanding, the study reveals that the children orient to the educator’s embodied actions at the initial stages. They do not initiate repair even if their response shows that their understanding is partial. During the second term, the children show increasing understanding of the verbal turns, and they also initiate repair in case of understanding problems. In terms of active production of second language, the study shows that the children first recycle lexemes and expressions previously used by the educator. At later stages, they also recycle syntactic structures, and modify the recycled items in Swedish. The focus of the study are the learning processes, but the products of learning are also in evidence, and manifested in the ways the children show understanding of the second language and how they use it

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAVIJÄRVI, M. (2022). From Shared Interaction to Shared Language: Learning a Second Language in an Immersion Kindergarten. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 197–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/531720

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Anward, J. (2005). Lexeme Recycled. How Categories Emerge from Interaction. Logos and Language V:2, 1–38.
  2. Anward, J. (2015). Doing Language. Studies in Language and Culture No 26. Linköping University. Artigal, J.M. (1991). The Catalan immersion. A European point of view. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Auer, P. (2005). Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text, 25, 7–39.
  3. Auer, P. & Pfänder, S. (Eds.) (2011). Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter. Björklund, S, Mård-Miettinen, K. & Savijärvi, M. (2014). Swedish immersion in the early years in Finland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(2), 197 –214. Brouwer, C. & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 29–47.
  4. Cekaite, A. (2007). A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in a Swedish L2 Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 45–62.
  5. Cekaite, A. & Aronsson K. (2004). Repetition and joking in children’s second language conversations: Playful recyclings in an immersion classroom. Discourse Studies, 6(3), 373–392.
  6. Cekaite, A. Blum-Kulka, S., Grøver,V, Teubal, E. (Eds.) (2014). Children’s peer talk – learning from each other. Cambridge Book Online. DuBois, J. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410.
  7. Farrar, M., J., Friend, M.J., & Forbes, J. N. (1993). Event knowledge and early language acquisition. The Journal of Child Language, 20, 591–606.
  8. Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997).
  9. On Discourse, Communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300.
  10. Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(Focus Issue), 800-819.
  11. Forrester, M. & Cherington, S. (2009). The development of other-related conversational skills: A case study of conversational repair during the early years. First Language, 29(2), 167–191.
  12. Goodwin, C & Goodwin, M H. (1987). Children´s arguing. S. Philips, S. Steele & C. Tanz (Eds.) Language, Gender and sex in Comparative Perspective (pp. 200–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Haakana, M. (2011). Mitä ja muut avoimet korjausaloitteet. Virittäjä 1, 36–67.
  14. Haakana, M., Kurhila, S., Lilja, N. & Savijärvi, M. (2016). Kuka, mitä, häh? Korjausaloitteet suomalaisessa arkikeskustelussa. Virittäjä, 120(2), 255-293.
  15. Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J. & Pekarek-Do