Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

‘What Can We Do to Talk More?’: Analysing Language Learners’ Online Interaction

Sayfa
215–237
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings of the analysis can help identify key foci for task design in similar online foreign language learning settings

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Previous studies have pointed out the need to consider carefully how digital tools are presented in schools to ensure their use meets authentic needs for today’s knowledge society.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Along these lines, this article analyses a 44-minute Skype videoconferencing session involving two small groups of middle school students who are studying English as a Foreign Language (EFL).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings of the analysis can help identify key foci for task design in similar online foreign language learning settings
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Previous studies have pointed out the need to consider carefully how digital tools are presented in schools to ensure their use meets authentic needs for today’s knowledge society. This implies that learning tasks should be planned so students’ practice with technological and digital resources such as videoconferencing and text chats resembles potential communicative situations they may face outside the classroom. Along these lines, this article analyses a 44-minute Skype videoconferencing session involving two small groups of middle school students who are studying English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The data come from a wider-scale telecollaborative project between two classes, one in Sweden and another in Spain, in which the students had to collaborate on a public awareness raising initiative regarding the Syrian refugee crisis. Applying a multimodal Conversation Analysis (CA) approach, the study aims to ‘unpack’ the complexity of the multiple resources used by the participants during the interaction. In particular, the article focuses on how the learners use multiple resources to creatively mediate their communication and to resolve problems that emerge during their interaction in the foreign language. The findings of the analysis can help identify key foci for task design in similar online foreign language learning settings

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOOLY, M., DAVITOVA, N. (2022). ‘What Can We Do to Talk More?’: Analysing Language Learners’ Online Interaction. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 215–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/531688

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Balaman, U. & Sert, O. (2017a). The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015
  2. Balaman, U. & Sert, O. (2017b). Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 601-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
  3. Barraja-Rohan, A. M. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence, Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412878
  4. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Bezemer, J. (2012). How to transcribe multimodal interaction? In C.D. Maier & S. Norris (Eds). Texts, images and interaction: A reader in multimodality (pp. 155-169). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 275-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8
  6. Burch, A. R. (2014). Pursuing Information: A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies: Pursuing information. Language Learning, 64(3), 651–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12064
  7. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90037-X
  8. Council of European Union (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020). Official Journal of the European Union, C 119/2, Document 52009XG0528(01). Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52009XG0528(01)
  9. Council of European Union (2016). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A new skills agenda for Europe. Working together to strengthen human capital, employability and competitiveness. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0381&from=EN
  10. Dooly, M. (2010) The teacher 2.0. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st Century (pp. 277-303). Bern: Peter Lang. Dooly, M. (2013) Speaking like a ‘glocal’: Using computer-mediated