Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Challenging and Objecting: Functions of Third Position Turns in Student-Initiated Question Sequences

Sayfa
298–315
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A central result is that question sequences provide the participants with learning tools that connect to the organisation of emotional and moral issues

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Research on the classical IRE-sequences in the classroom context has highlighted teachers’ use of questions as teaching tools and how questioning processes serve as efficient learning tools.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:One especially important turn in questioning processes is the third position of the sequence which incorporates the potential to enhance learning and provide resources for students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A central result is that question sequences provide the participants with learning tools that connect to the organisation of emotional and moral issues
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Research on the classical IRE-sequences in the classroom context has highlighted teachers’ use of questions as teaching tools and how questioning processes serve as efficient learning tools. One especially important turn in questioning processes is the third position of the sequence which incorporates the potential to enhance learning and provide resources for students. This article examines sequences similar to the IRE-sequence – student-initiated question sequences – focusing on the third position of these sequences. In the default question sequence, the third position is used to signal an acceptance of the prior response. The analysis examines turns that signal disalignment with the teacher and may therefore communicate a challenge or an objection to the teacher. The aim is to demonstrate how the different formats of third positions are used to express fine-grained challenges concerning the granularity of knowledge and epistemic responsibilities. Thus, non-aligning dialogue particles, follow-up questions or postexpansions in third position can convey a challenging quality. The research method adopted is ethnomethodological conversation analysis. A detailed sequential analysis demonstrates that troubles encountered in mutual understanding may be related to issues of epistemicity and moral order. A central result is that question sequences provide the participants with learning tools that connect to the organisation of emotional and moral issues

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MERKE, S. (2022). Challenging and Objecting: Functions of Third Position Turns in Student-Initiated Question Sequences. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 298–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/531656

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Bergmann, J. & Luckmann, T. (Ed.) (1999). Die kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. Evnitskaya, N. & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal misplays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71-94.
  2. Heinonen, P. (2017). Evaluointi opettajan vuorovaikutustoimintana. Osallistujuuden ulottuvuudet luokkahuoneessa [Evaluation as a teacher's interactional practice: dimensions of classroom participation]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29.
  3. Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions, In J.P. De Ruiter (Ed.) Questions. Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179-192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Jacknick, C. (2011). "But this is writing": Post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas Royal, Research on Youth and Language, 5(1), 39-54.
  5. Jakonen, T. (2014). Knowing matters. How students address lack of knowledge in bilingual classroom. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Jakonen, T. & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73-94. Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students' epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86-105.
  6. Kasper, G. & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition, In D. Atkinson (Ed.) Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117-142). New York: Routledge. Keppler, A. (1989). Schritt für Schritt. Das Verfahren alltäglicher Belehrungen. Soziale Welt, 40, 538-556.
  7. Koole, T., 2010. Displays of epistemic access: Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2), 183-209.
  8. Lee, Y.-A. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quartely 40(4), 691-713.
  9. Lee, Y.-A. (2008). Yes‒No questions in the third-turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes. Discourse Processes, 45, 237-262.
  10. Lehtimaja, I. (2012). Puheen suuntia luokkahuoneessa. Oppilaat osallistujina yläkoulun suomi toisena kielenä - tunnilla [Directions of talk in the classroom. Pupils as participants of Finnish-as-L2 lessons.] Univ