KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Learner Initiative in the Spanish as a Foreign Language Classroom: Implications for the Interactional Development

Jaume Batlle RODRIGUEZ
Isabel Murillo WILSTERMANN
Sayfa
113–133
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The analyses reveal that some initiatives do not alter -but support- the ongoing interaction, while others lead to marked changes and readjustments in the IRF sequence

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Classroom interaction has been widely studied using the conversation analysis methodology in order to explore and understand interactional practices that enhance language learning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Variability within the IRF sequence, regarding the learner's initiative to take the floor, has been investigated and its potential benefits to generate language learning opportunities have been acknowledged.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The analyses reveal that some initiatives do not alter -but support- the ongoing interaction, while others lead to marked changes and readjustments in the IRF sequence
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Classroom interaction has been widely studied using the conversation analysis methodology in order to explore and understand interactional practices that enhance language learning. This research has been traditionally focused on the canonical teacher-student classroom interaction, called Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) sequence, composed by a teacher's first turn, a student's response and a third turn performed by the teacher to evaluate or give feedback. Variability within the IRF sequence, regarding the learner's initiative to take the floor, has been investigated and its potential benefits to generate language learning opportunities have been acknowledged. Employing Conversation Analysis, in this article we investigate learner initiatives in teacher-student interactions obtained from 40 hours of video-recorded Spanish as a foreign language lessons in Barcelona, Spain. We aim to explore and characterize students´ initiatives in a meaning-focused round robin sequence and analyze the implications of nonallocated turns for the progressivity of the interaction. The analyses reveal that some initiatives do not alter -but support- the ongoing interaction, while others lead to marked changes and readjustments in the IRF sequence

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RODRIGUEZ, J. B., WILSTERMANN, I. M. (2022). Learner Initiative in the Spanish as a Foreign Language Classroom: Implications for the Interactional Development. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 113–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/531655

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Appel, J. (2010). Participation and instructed language learning. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics. (pp. 206-224) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Batlle, J. (2014). Identidad y gestión del tema en una interacción por turnos entre profesor y alumnos. Marcoele, 18 [Available online at: http://marcoele.com/identidad-y-gestion-del-tema-en-una-interaccion-por-turnos-entreprofesor-y-alumnos/] Retreived on: 18.08.2017.
  2. Batlle, J. (2015). La organización secuencial de las reparaciones en interacciones entre profesor y alumnos de español como lengua extranjera centradas en el significado: repercusión en la intersubjetividad y la competencia interaccional de los hablantes. Doctoral dissertation University of Barcelona [Available online at: http://tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/390950/JBR_TESIS.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y] Retrieved on: 18.08.2017.
  3. Bowles, H. & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.) (2007). Conversation Analysis and Language for Specific Purposes. Berna: Peter Lang. Cekaite, A. (2009). Soliciting Teacher Attention in an L2 Classroom: Affect Displays, Classroom Artefacts, and Embodied Action. In Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 26-48.
  4. Clift, R. (2016). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interaction. In I. Marková & K. Froppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in Dialogue. (pp.29-48) Maryland: Barnes and Noble Books. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1992). Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: CUP. Evnitskaya, N. & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ Multimodal Displays of Willingness to Participate in Classroom Interaction in the L2 and CLIL Contexts. In Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71-94.
  5. Fasel Lauzon, V. & Berger, E. (2015). The multimodal organization of speaker selection in classroom interaction. In Linguistics and Education, 31, 14-29.
  6. Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation Analysis in the Classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. (pp. 593-611) Boston: Wiley-Blackwell. Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. In Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29-45.
  7. Hall, J. (1998). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. In Linguistics and Education, 9(3), 287-311.
  8. Hepburn, A. & Bold