Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Teacher Practices in Establishing Understanding in a Foreign Language Classroom

Sayfa
36–53
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study is also concerned with examining the degree of multimodal unpacking required to establish shared understanding through which the teacher’s plan as a dynamic process becomes visible

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper describes the resources drawn on to build understanding and participation in an Italian as a foreign language classroom.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Extracts for analysis in the study were taken from two 50-minute lessons with 26 students aged 13 to 14 years at A2 (CEFR) level who were in their second year of high school in an Australian public school.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study is also concerned with examining the degree of multimodal unpacking required to establish shared understanding through which the teacher’s plan as a dynamic process becomes visible
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper describes the resources drawn on to build understanding and participation in an Italian as a foreign language classroom. Extracts for analysis in the study were taken from two 50-minute lessons with 26 students aged 13 to 14 years at A2 (CEFR) level who were in their second year of high school in an Australian public school. The lessons focused on language practice in which the teacher subscribed to a L2 use only policy as part of her teacher talk. This pedagogical stance provided an opportunity to analyse how this policy affected teacher expectations with respect to what students ought to have comprehended in Italian. It did this by analysing the resources the teacher used to display these expectations through her pursuing actions, the deployment of the do you remember recognition check (Schegloff, 1988; Shaw & Kitzinger, 2007; You, 2015) and the no-one knows epistemic status check (Sert, 2013), and her alternation to the L1 when all these resources failed to lead to a display of student understanding. The study is also concerned with examining the degree of multimodal unpacking required to establish shared understanding through which the teacher’s plan as a dynamic process becomes visible

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

FILIPI, A. (2022). Teacher Practices in Establishing Understanding in a Foreign Language Classroom. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 36–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/531653

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Amir, A. (2013). Self-policing in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Novitas-ROYAL, 7(2), 84–105.
  2. Amir, A., & Musk, N. (2013). Language policing: Micro-level language policy-in-process in the foreign language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 4(2), 151–167.
  3. Auer, P. (1995). The pragmatics of codeswitching: A sequential approach. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (pp. 115–135).
  4. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325–352.
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning, 2nd edition. (pp. 11–32). London: SAGE. Bonacina, F. (2010). A Conversation Analytic Approach to Practiced Language Policies: The Example of an Induction Classroom for Newly-arrived Immigrant Children in France. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Edinburgh. Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2012). Researching ‘Practiced Language Policies’: Insights from Conversation Analysis. Language Policy, 11, 213–234.
  7. Bonacina, F., & Gafaranga, J. (2011). ‘Medium of instruction’ vs. ‘medium of classroom interaction’: Language choice in a French complementary school classroom in Scotland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(3), 319–334. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2010.502222. Cheng, T-P. (2013). Codeswitching and participant orientations in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 869–886. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12046.x. Cheng, T-P. (2014). The interactional achievements of repair and correction in a Mandarin language classroom. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 3(2), 175–200.
  8. Council of Europe (2001). The Common European Framework Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cromdal, J. (2004). Building bilingual oppositions: Code-switching in children’s disputes. Language in Society, 33, 33–58.
  10. Eskildsen, S. W., & Markee, N. (In press). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In R. Alonso Alonso (Ed.), Speaking in a L2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Filipi, A. (1994). Interaction in an Italian oral test: The role of some expansion sequences. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 119–136.
  11. Filipi, A. (2009). Toddler and parent interaction: The organisation of gaze, pointing and vocalization.