Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

The Impact of School Tracking on Secondary Vocational Education and Training in Turkey

Sayfa
855–870
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results show that the disadvantage caused by tracking in VET has continued at a similar level over the last decade, and that this disadvantage has grown in the years when the scale of tracking increases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:School tracking has been a structural characteristic of education systems for many years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Student population data at 12th grade between 2010 and 2019 is analyzed in study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results show that the disadvantage caused by tracking in VET has continued at a similar level over the last decade, and that this disadvantage has grown in the years when the scale of tracking increases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

School tracking has been a structural characteristic of education systems for many years. School tracking is generally implemented at the high school level, where students are divided into academic and vocational education groups. It is important to examine the effects of school tracking because the effect of tracking may vary between education types. The present study examines the effects of tracking on VET in Turkey over the past decade. For this purpose, the socioeconomic characteristics of all students tracked into VET high schools over the past ten years were compared with those placed in other types of high schools. This method aimed to determine the effects of tracking on the academic achievement of the VET students. Student population data at 12th grade between 2010 and 2019 is analyzed in study. The predictive power of secondary school achievement and socioeconomic status is examined with multiple regression analysis. The results indicated that VET high school students from all socioeconomic backgrounds have been in a disadvantaged position for the past decade. The research identified that the education level of fathers caused the greatest disadvantage for VET high school students, compared with their peers studying in other high schools. As the percentage of students placed in different schools increased by tracking, the prediction power of students’ early academic performance and socioeconomic levels on academic achievement also increased. Considering the socioeconomic disadvantage of VET students, this result indicates that when the level of tracking increases, inequality also increases. The results show that the disadvantage caused by tracking in VET has continued at a similar level over the last decade, and that this disadvantage has grown in the years when the scale of tracking increases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SUNA, H. E., ÖZER, M. (2022). The Impact of School Tracking on Secondary Vocational Education and Training in Turkey. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 855–870. https://ajindex.com/articles/531529

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper 24196. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192.
  2. Aldan Karademir, Ç. (2007). Düzey dersliklerinin ilköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersine ilişkin akademik başarıları ve benlik saygısı üzerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi.
  3. Aşıcı, M., Baysal, N., & Şahenk-Erkan, S. (2012). A comparison of the reading comprehension questions in PISA 2009 and national level determination exam in Turkey. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 210–217.
  4. Ataç, E. (2017). Reading educational inequalities in Turkey: Statistics and geographic distributions. Education & Science, 42(192), 59-86.
  5. Aydın, E., & Tugal, I. (2005). On the influence of grouping practices on classroom teaching. Essays in Education, 14. Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, İ. (2005). Investigation of student achievement across years, school types and regions: SSE and PISA analyses. Educational Sciences and Practice, 4(7), 21–35.
  6. Biewen, M., & Tapalaga, M. (2017). Early tracking, academic vs. vocational training and the value of ‘second chance’ options. IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 11080. Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: Brown R. K. (Ed.) Knowledge, educational and cultural change, pp. 71–112.
  7. London, Tavistock. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London, Sage Publications. Bölükbaş, S., & Gür, B. S. (2020). Tracking and inequality: The results from Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102262. Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22, 781-861.
  8. Canbal, M.S., Kerkez, B., Suna, H.E., Numanoğlu, K.V., & Ozer, M. (2020). Mesleki ve teknik ortaöğretimde paradigma değişimi için yeni bir adım: Eğitim programlarının güncellenmesi. Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri: Teori ve Uygulama, 11(21), 1-26.
  9. Cansız, M., Ozbayanlı, B., & Çolakoğlu, M. H. (2019). Impact of school type on student academic achievement. Education & Science, 44(197), 275-314.
  10. Carbonaro, W. (2005). Tracking, students’ effort, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education 78, 27–49.
  11. Dolean, D., Melby-Lervåg, M.,