KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

An Attempt to Develop A Scale on the Decision Process: The Manager Decision Time Scale

İbrahim DURMUŞ
Sedat BOSTAN
Sayfa
125–141
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The scale that was formed with the data obtained at the end of this study has been proved to be a valid and reliable data-obtaining tool.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable data-obtaining tool for exploring which decision stage deems sufficient for managers in the public or private sector, how they use time and how they act in different occasions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The 389 participant of this study consist of public and private sector managers in the cities of Gümüşhane and Bayburt in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The scale that was formed with the data obtained at the end of this study has been proved to be a valid and reliable data-obtaining tool.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Management · manager · decision process

Özet

The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable data-obtaining tool for exploring which decision stage deems sufficient for managers in the public or private sector, how they use time and how they act in different occasions. Also, a scale demonstrating the approaches which managers are following in their decision processes has not been seen among past studies. This study has been carried out in order to close this gap. The scale has been developed in consideration of the managers’ recommendations about the decision process. Sampling method applied in research is easy sampling method. The 389 participant of this study consist of public and private sector managers in the cities of Gümüşhane and Bayburt in Turkey. The results of this study are assembled under four factors as “manager’s problem noticing time, manager’s problem defining time, manager’s problem solving time, and the manager’s decision time on different occasions.” A “Manager Decision Time Scale” containing 13 items has been developed from these Likert scale factors. It has been tested for validity by Model-Defining Factor Analysis. The scale that was formed with the data obtained at the end of this study has been proved to be a valid and reliable data-obtaining tool.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURMUŞ, İ., BOSTAN, S. (2022). An Attempt to Develop A Scale on the Decision Process: The Manager Decision Time Scale. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 125–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/531043

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Al-Tarawneh H.A. (2012) The Main Factors beyond Decision Making. Journal of Management Research 4(1): 1-23
  2. Armesh H. (2010) Decision Making. Global Economy and Finance Journal (Session: Management) (Ed. Zia Haqq) (pp. 483-506). 12th International Business Research Conference, Dubai
  3. Asemi A., Safari A. and Zavareh A. A. (2011) The Role of Management Information System (MIS) and Decision Support System (DSS) for Manager’s Decision Making Process. International Journal of Business and Management 6(7): 164-173
  4. Beach L. R. and Mitchell T. R. (1978). A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies. The Academy of Management Review 3(3): 439-449
  5. Busemeyer J.R. and Townsend J.T. (1993) Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic-Cognitive Approach to Decision Making in an Uncertain Environment. Psychological Review 100(3): 432-459
  6. Campitelli G. and Gobet F. (2010) Herbert Simon’s Decision-Making Approach: Investigation of Cognitive Processes in Experts. Review of General Psychology 14(4): 354-364
  7. Caramelli M. and Van De Vijver F. J. R. (2013) Towards a Comprehensive Procedure for Developing Measurement Scales for Cross-Cultural Management Research. International Management 17(2): 150-187
  8. Churchill Jr. G. A. (1979) A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. A Journal of Marketing Research 16(1): 64-73
  9. Conteh N. (2009) The Hypothesis Testing of Decision Making Styles in the Decision Making Process. Journal of Technology Research (1): 1-17
  10. De Vellis R. F. (2003) Scale Development Theory and Applications (2nd Edition). SAGE Publications, London
  11. Duque M.J., Turla C. and Evangelista L. (2013) Effects of Emotional State on Decision Making Time. The 9th International Conference on Cognitive Science. 97 (6): 137-146
  12. Farquhar P. H. and Pratkanis A. R. (1993) Decision Structuring with Phantom Alternatives. Management Science 39(10): 1214-1226
  13. Galotti K. M., Ciner E., Altenbaumer H. E., Gerrts H. J., Rupp A. and Woulfe J. (2006) Decision-Making Styles in a Real-Life Decision: Choosing a College Major. Personality and Individual Differences 41(4): 629-539
  14. Garvin David A. and Roberto Michael A. (2001) What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions. Harvard Business Review 79(8): 108-116
  15. Hair J. F. Jr., Black W. C., Babin B. J. and Anderson R. E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  16. Herrera F., Herrera V. E. and Verdegay J. L. (1996) A Model o