KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Comparative analysis between FAR and ARL based control charts with runs rules

Rashid Mehmood
Muhammad Hisyam Lee
Iftikhar Ali
Muhammad Riaz
Sayfa
275–288
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this approach, we have determined that behavior of FAR and ARL based control charts using the real data is recorded similar to the behavior using the statistical performance indicators.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, we have conducted comparative analysis between false alarm rate (FAR) and average run length (ARL) based control charts with runs rules.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For evaluation purpose, we have used actual false alarm rate, power, in-control actual average run length, and out-of-control average run length as performance indicators.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this approach, we have determined that behavior of FAR and ARL based control charts using the real data is recorded similar to the behavior using the statistical performance indicators.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Average run length · control chart · false alarm rate

Abstract

In this study, we have conducted comparative analysis between false alarm rate (FAR) and average run length (ARL) based control charts with runs rules. In this regard, we have considered various univariate and multivariate control charts which include mean, standard deviation, variance, Hotelling, and generalized variance. For evaluation purpose, we have used actual false alarm rate, power, in-control actual average run length, and out-of-control average run length as performance indicators. Furthermore, the performance indicators are calculated through Monte Carlo simulation procedures. Results revealed that performance order of runs rules with FAR based control charts are persistent whereas, performance order of runs rules with ARL based control charts are dependent on the circumstances, that is, sample size, size of shift, type of control chart, and side of control limit (upper-sided and lower-sided). Besides, we have provided a real life example using the data on electrical resistance of insulation. In this approach, we have determined that behavior of FAR and ARL based control charts using the real data is recorded similar to the behavior using the statistical performance indicators.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Mehmood, R., Lee, M. H., Ali, I., Riaz, M. (2022). Comparative analysis between FAR and ARL based control charts with runs rules. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 275–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/529977

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. L.C. Alwan, Statistical Process Analysis, McGraw-Hill International Editions, Singapore, 2000
  2. S. Chakraborti and S. Eryilmaz, A nonparametric Shewhart-type signed-rank control chart based on runs, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 36 (2), 335–356, 2007
  3. C.W. Champ and W.H. Woodall, Exact results for Shewhart control charts with supplementary runs rules, Technometrics 29 (4), 393–399, 1987
  4. M.B. Khoo, Design of runs rules schemes, Qual. Eng. 16 (1), 27–43, 2003
  5. M. Klein, Two alternatives to the shewhart x control chart, J. Qual. Technol. 32 (4), 427–431, 2000
  6. J.C. Malela-Majika, S.C. Shongwe and P. Castagliola, One-sided precedence monitoring schemes for unknown shift sizes using generalized 2-of-(h+1) and w-of-w improved runs-rules, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 1–35, 2020
  7. R. Mehmood, M.H. Lee, M. Riaz, B. Zaman and I. Ali, Hotelling T2 control chart based on bivariate ranked set schemes, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 1–28, 2019
  8. R. Mehmood, M.S. Qazi and M. Riaz, On the performance of $\bar{X}$ control chart for known and unknown parameters supplemented with runs rules under different probability distributions, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 88 (4), 675–711, 2018
  9. R. Mehmood, M. Riaz and R.J.M.M. Does, Control charts for location based on different sampling schemes, J. Appl. Stat. 40 (3), 483–494, 2013
  10. R. Mehmood, M. Riaz and R.J.M.M. Does, Efficient power computation for r out of m runs rules schemes, Comput. Statist. 28 (2), 667–681, 2013
  11. R. Mehmood, M. Riaz and R.J.M.M. Does, Quality quandaries: on the application of different ranked set sampling schemes, Qual. Eng. 26 (3), 370–378, 2014
  12. R. Mehmood, M. Riaz, T. Mahmood, S.A. Abbasi and N. Abbas, On the extended use of auxiliary information under skewness correction for process monitoring, Trans. Inst. Meas. Control. 39 (6), 883–897, 2017
  13. D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley Sons, New York, 2009
  14. Jr, J.J. Pignatiello and G.C. Runger, Comparisons of multivariate cusum charts, J. Qual. Technol. 22 (3), 173–186, 1990
  15. M. Riaz, R. Mehmood and R.J.M.M. Does, On the performance of different control charting rules, Qual. Reliab. Eng. 27 (8), 1059–1067, 2011
  16. D.K. Shepherd, S.E. Rigdon and C.W. Champ, Using runs rules to monitor an attribute chart for a markov process, QTQM 9 (4), 383–406, 2012
  17. W.A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, ASQ Quality Press, 1931