KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

THE FUNCTION OF METACOGNITION IN INSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY

Ayşe ÖZTÜRK
Melike ÖZYURT
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
1143–1166
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The present study is significant in terms ofuncovering the function of instructional cognitive awareness in the process of professionaldevelopment in teacher training, discovering what and how the IM has affected the quality ofhigh and low instructional performances and determining the problems encountered in thisprocess.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to investigate the instructional metacognition of pre-service elementaryteachers with high and low level of proficiency on teaching skills.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result of thestudy, the instructional metacognition (IM) strategies and behaviors adopted by the HLPs andthe LLPs during the teaching process were modelled, comparatively evaluated, andsimilarities or dissimilarities were revealed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The present study is significant in terms ofuncovering the function of instructional cognitive awareness in the process of professionaldevelopment in teacher training, discovering what and how the IM has affected the quality ofhigh and low instructional performances and determining the problems encountered in thisprocess.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the instructional metacognition of pre-service elementaryteachers with high and low level of proficiency on teaching skills. The comparative casestudy was carried out on six pre-service elementary school teachers, three of whom had highlevel of proficiency (HLP) and the other three with low level of proficiency (LLP) onteaching skills. The research data were collected through unstructured observation and semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed through content analysis. As a result of thestudy, the instructional metacognition (IM) strategies and behaviors adopted by the HLPs andthe LLPs during the teaching process were modelled, comparatively evaluated, andsimilarities or dissimilarities were revealed. The present study is significant in terms ofuncovering the function of instructional cognitive awareness in the process of professionaldevelopment in teacher training, discovering what and how the IM has affected the quality ofhigh and low instructional performances and determining the problems encountered in thisprocess.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, A., ÖZYURT, M. (2022). THE FUNCTION OF METACOGNITION IN INSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1143–1166. https://ajindex.com/articles/524416

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Arends, R. I. (1998). Resource handbook: Learning to teach. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved on 22.04.2020 from https://hasanahummi.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/ connect-learn succeed-richard-arends-learning-to-teach-mcgraw-hill-2012.pdf Armour-Thomas, E. (1989). The application of teacher cognition in the classroom: A new teaching competency. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 22(3), 29 37. Artzt, A., & Armour-Thomas, E. (2001). Mathematics teaching as problem solving: SA framework for studying teacher metacognition underlying instructional practice in mathematics. H. J. Hartman (Ed.), In Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp.127-148). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Balcikanli, C. (2011). Metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Education, 9(3), 1309-1332. doi:10.5539/jel.v6n4p78 Baltaci, A.(2018). School Administrators' Metacognitive Awareness Levels. Trakya Journal of Education, 8(4), 840-854. doi: 10.24315/trkefd.313693. Baykara, K. (2011). A study on “teacher efficacy perceptions” and “metacognitive learning strategies” of prospective teachers. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40(40), 80-92. Retrieved on 19.02.2020 from: http://efdergi.hacettepe. edu.tr/shw_artcl396.html Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An Introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publications. Brookfield, S. B.(1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Byra, M., & Sherman, M. (1991). Preactive and interactive decission of experienced and inexperienced novice teachers. Paper presented at the Round table presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Christensen, L. B., Burke Johnson, R., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. (A. Aypay, Trans.). Ankara:
  3. Anı Publishment. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Costa, A. (1984). "Thinking: How do we know students are getting better at it?" Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 6(4), 197-199. doi:10.1080/02783198409 552809. Curwen, M. S., Miller, R. G., White-Smith, K. A., & Calfee, R. C. (2010). Increasing teachers' metacognition develops students' higher learning during content area literacy instruction: Findings from the read-write cycle project. Issues in Teacher