SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

THE FUNCTION OF METACOGNITION IN INSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY

Ayşe ÖZTÜRK
Melike ÖZYURT
Journal
IOJET
Pages
1143–1166
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present study is significant in terms ofuncovering the function of instructional cognitive awareness in the process of professionaldevelopment in teacher training, discovering what and how the IM has affected the quality ofhigh and low instructional performances and determining the problems encountered in thisprocess.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the instructional metacognition of pre-service elementaryteachers with high and low level of proficiency on teaching skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of thestudy, the instructional metacognition (IM) strategies and behaviors adopted by the HLPs andthe LLPs during the teaching process were modelled, comparatively evaluated, andsimilarities or dissimilarities were revealed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present study is significant in terms ofuncovering the function of instructional cognitive awareness in the process of professionaldevelopment in teacher training, discovering what and how the IM has affected the quality ofhigh and low instructional performances and determining the problems encountered in thisprocess.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the instructional metacognition of pre-service elementaryteachers with high and low level of proficiency on teaching skills. The comparative casestudy was carried out on six pre-service elementary school teachers, three of whom had highlevel of proficiency (HLP) and the other three with low level of proficiency (LLP) onteaching skills. The research data were collected through unstructured observation and semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed through content analysis. As a result of thestudy, the instructional metacognition (IM) strategies and behaviors adopted by the HLPs andthe LLPs during the teaching process were modelled, comparatively evaluated, andsimilarities or dissimilarities were revealed. The present study is significant in terms ofuncovering the function of instructional cognitive awareness in the process of professionaldevelopment in teacher training, discovering what and how the IM has affected the quality ofhigh and low instructional performances and determining the problems encountered in thisprocess.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, A., ÖZYURT, M. (2022). THE FUNCTION OF METACOGNITION IN INSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1143–1166. https://ajindex.com/articles/524416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Arends, R. I. (1998). Resource handbook: Learning to teach. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved on 22.04.2020 from https://hasanahummi.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/ connect-learn succeed-richard-arends-learning-to-teach-mcgraw-hill-2012.pdf Armour-Thomas, E. (1989). The application of teacher cognition in the classroom: A new teaching competency. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 22(3), 29 37. Artzt, A., & Armour-Thomas, E. (2001). Mathematics teaching as problem solving: SA framework for studying teacher metacognition underlying instructional practice in mathematics. H. J. Hartman (Ed.), In Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp.127-148). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Balcikanli, C. (2011). Metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Education, 9(3), 1309-1332. doi:10.5539/jel.v6n4p78 Baltaci, A.(2018). School Administrators' Metacognitive Awareness Levels. Trakya Journal of Education, 8(4), 840-854. doi: 10.24315/trkefd.313693. Baykara, K. (2011). A study on “teacher efficacy perceptions” and “metacognitive learning strategies” of prospective teachers. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40(40), 80-92. Retrieved on 19.02.2020 from: http://efdergi.hacettepe. edu.tr/shw_artcl396.html Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An Introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publications. Brookfield, S. B.(1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Byra, M., & Sherman, M. (1991). Preactive and interactive decission of experienced and inexperienced novice teachers. Paper presented at the Round table presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Christensen, L. B., Burke Johnson, R., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. (A. Aypay, Trans.). Ankara:
  3. Anı Publishment. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Costa, A. (1984). "Thinking: How do we know students are getting better at it?" Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 6(4), 197-199. doi:10.1080/02783198409 552809. Curwen, M. S., Miller, R. G., White-Smith, K. A., & Calfee, R. C. (2010). Increasing teachers' metacognition develops students' higher learning during content area literacy instruction: Findings from the read-write cycle project. Issues in Teacher