KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2018 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Planning Activities in Software Testing Process: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research

Utku KÖSE
M. Hanefi CALP
Sayfa
801–819
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this point, the study is expected to contribute the literature.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Software testing process consists of activities that implemented after it is planned and includingto document related testing activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, software testing process, and test planning activitiescarried out in this process was first clearly demonstrated by the literature review.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this point, the study is expected to contribute the literature.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Software testing process consists of activities that implemented after it is planned and includingto document related testing activities. Test processes must be applied necessarily for able toclearly see the quality of software, the degree of reliability, whether it is ready for delivery, thedegree of effectiveness and remains of how much testing. One of the most important phase ofthese processes is test planning activities. Test planning activities directly affects the project'ssuccess in software projects. In this study, software testing process, and test planning activitiescarried out in this process was first clearly demonstrated by the literature review. Later, a basicsoftware testing process and test planning process were determined and explained step by step.In this way, it was aimed to give a different and deep perspective to the test planning activitiesand to raise awareness on the topic. As a result of the research, it was seen that the test planningactivities are not applied adequately at present, software testers, experts or researchers do nothave enough knowledge about the details of the method, and this situation causes very seriousnegative results in the delivery and cost in software projects. Finally, the topic was discussed indetail, and some conclusions and recommendations were given for the personnel in the field ofsoftware testing. In this point, the study is expected to contribute the literature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖSE, U., CALP, M. H. (2022). Planning Activities in Software Testing Process: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 801–819. https://ajindex.com/articles/521459

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Gürbüz, A., Kurt, A., Özbek, M., “Pitfalls in Software Testing Tool Selection”, III. National Software Engineering Symposium, Ankara, 1, (2007).
  2. Britton, T., Jeng, L., Carver, G., Cheak, P., Katzenellenbogen, T., “Reversible Debugging Software”, University of Cambridge, Judge Business School, (2013).
  3. Garousi, V., Felderer, M., Hacaloğlu, T., “Software test maturity assessment and test process improvement: A multivocal literature review”, Information and Software Technology, 85, 16-42, (2017).
  4. Garousi, V., Coskuncay, A., Can, A. B., Demirors, O., “A survey of software engineering practices in Turkey”, J. Syst. Software, 108, 148–177, (2015).
  5. Garousi, V., Zhi, J., “A survey of software testing practices in Canada”, J. Syst. Software, 86, 1354– 1376, (2013).
  6. Grindal, M., Offutt, J., Mellin, J., “On the testing maturity of software producing organizations”, Testing: Academia & Industry Conference-Practice and Research Techniques, (2006).
  7. Walia, M., Gupta, A., “Improvement in Key Project Performance Indicators through deployment of a Comprehensive Test Metrics Advisory Tool”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(5), (2017).
  8. Wasif, A., "Metrics in software test planning and test design processes", (2007).
  9. Pressman, R. S., "Software engineering: a practitioner's approach", Palgrave Macmillan, (2005).
  10. Bormann, J., Fedeli, A., Frank, R., Winkelmann, K., “Combined Static and Dynamic Verification”, Research Report, FP6-IST-507219, Version 2-Public Version, (2005).
  11. Korkmaz, O., Akman, I., “An MDP Based Simulation Model and An Example Application to Evaluate Software Quality”, VI. National Software Engineering Symposium (NSES), Ankara, 1, (2009).
  12. Galin, D., “Software Quality Assurance – From theory to implementation”, Pearson – Addison Wesley, England, (2004).
  13. Jamil, M. A., Arif, M., Abubakar, N. S. A., Ahmad, A., “Software Testing Techniques: A Literature Review”, In Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 2016 6th International Conference on, pp. 177-182,
  14. IEEE, November, (2016).
  15. De Nicola, G., di Tommaso, P., Rosaria, E., Francesco, F., Pietro, M., Antonio, O., “A grey-box approach to the functional testing of complex automatic train protection systems”, In European Dependable Computing Conference (pp. 305-317).
  16. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2005).
  17. Garousi, V., Mäntylä, M. V., “When and what to automate in software testing? A multi-vocal literature review”, Information and Software Technology, 76, 92-117, (