Dergiler / Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form of Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery Scale

Sayfa
158–166
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: The research results suggest that the Turkish version of the “Post-Discharge Surgical Scale” is a valid and reliable measurement tool and can be used in scientific research and health care institutions to measure recovery post dischange.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: This study was carried out to adapt the “Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery Scale “ developed by Kleinbeck into Turkish and analyze the scale’s validity and reliability.METHODS:The study sample consisted of 343 patients who underwent surgery in a state hospital operating in the province of Diyarbakır, in the province of Istanbul.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample consisted of 271 people due to voluntary participation and reasons for not being able to reach.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: The research results suggest that the Turkish version of the “Post-Discharge Surgical Scale” is a valid and reliable measurement tool and can be used in scientific research and health care institutions to measure recovery post dischange.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

AIM: This study was carried out to adapt the “Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery Scale “ developed by Kleinbeck into Turkish and analyze the scale’s validity and reliability.METHODS:The study sample consisted of 343 patients who underwent surgery in a state hospital operating in the province of Diyarbakır, in the province of Istanbul. The sample consisted of 271 people due to voluntary participation and reasons for not being able to reach. This research, which is of methodological type, was carried out between April and July 2019. The Individual Information Form and the Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery Scale, which the researchers developed by scanning the literature, were used to collect the data. In the validity and reliability study of the scale; Linguistic equivalence, content validity for expert assessment, the correlation between items for internal consistency/reliability, and calculating Cronbach alpha values and confirmatory and exploratory factor analyzes were performed for construct validity. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 and IBM SPSS Amos 21 programs were used for statistical evaluation of the data. RESULTS:It was determined that the content validity index of the scale was 0.96, the correlation values between the items were r=0.47-0.97, the explained variance was 75.238%, and it was gathered under a single factor. The general reliability of the scale is very high as alpha=0.975. In the confirmatory factor analysis for the scale, the fit indices of the scale were CFI = 0.76; NNFI = 0.93; It was determined that RMR =0.11 and RMSEA = 0.13, AGFI=0.69, GFI=0.77. CONCLUSION: The research results suggest that the Turkish version of the “Post-Discharge Surgical Scale” is a valid and reliable measurement tool and can be used in scientific research and health care institutions to measure recovery post dischange.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çınar, F., Aslan, F. E., Korkmaz, E., Azizoğlu, H. (2022). Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form of Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery Scale. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 158–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/517337

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2016). Manual of data analysis for social sci-ences. Ankara:
  2. Pegem Akademi. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Gu-ilford Press,
  3. New York, USA. Carpenter, J. S., Heit, M., Chen, C. X., Stewart, R., Hamner, J., & Rand, K. L. (2017). Validating the Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Scale 13 as a Measure of Perceived Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Medicine & Recon-structive Surgery, 23(2), 86-89. [Crossref] Cengiz, H. & Aygin, D. (2019). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the postoperative recovery index of patients undergoing surgical intervention. Turkish Journal of Medical Sci-ences, 49, 566-573. [Crossref] Çınar, F., Şengül, H., Çapar, H., Çakmak, C. & Bilge, Y. (2018). Health news perception: A scale development study. G.O.P. Taksim Education Research JAREN, 4(3), 164-171. [Crossref] Dağistanlı, S., Kalaycı, M. U., & Kara, Y. (2018). Genel cerrahide ERAS protokolünün değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of ERAS proto-col in general surgery]. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Medical Journal, 10(Additional issue), 9-20.
  4. Dal, Ü., Bulut, H., & Demir, G. (2012). Cerrahi girişim sonrası hastaların evde yaşadıkları sorunlar. [Problems experienced by patients at home after surgical intervention]. Bakırköy Journal of Medicine, 8(1), 34-40. [Crossref] ERAS Society, https://erassociety.org/ (Accessed April 2019)Ersoy, E., & Gundogdu, H. (2007). Cerrahi sonrası iyileşmenin hızlandırılması [Accelerating postoperative recovery]. National Journal of Surgery, 23(1), 35-40.
  5. Gundogdu, H. (2018). ERAS: Tarihçe ve felsefesi. [ERAS: His-tory and philosophy]. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Medical Journal, 10(Additional issue), 1-4.
  6. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Elec-tronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  7. Karakoc, F.Y. & Donmez, L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışma-larında temel ilkeler. [Basic principles in scale development stud-ies]. Medical Education World, 40, 39-49. [Crossref] Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel Publication and Distribution. Kleinbeck, S. V. M. (2000). Self-reported at-home postop-erative recovery. Research in Nursing Health, 23(6), 461-472. [Crossref] Lawshe C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content va-lidity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. [Crossref] Malley, A., Kenner, C., Kim, T., & Blakeney, B. (2015). Th