Dergiler / Teknik Dergi / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Roughness Coefficient of a Highly Calcinated Penstock

Sayfa
9309–9325
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is found that a surface roughness value (ε) of 0.3mm can be used for calcinated surfaces which is much higher than steel surfaces but smaller than concrete.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:When highly calcinated water is transferred through the penstock of a hydropower plant it leaves a residue on the pipe surface.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Accumulated residue over time causes a change in the roughness of the pipe surface thus friction losses in the system.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is found that a surface roughness value (ε) of 0.3mm can be used for calcinated surfaces which is much higher than steel surfaces but smaller than concrete.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Friction factor · Surface roughness · Calcination

Özet

When highly calcinated water is transferred through the penstock of a hydropower plant it leaves a residue on the pipe surface. Accumulated residue over time causes a change in the roughness of the pipe surface thus friction losses in the system. The effect is a change in head and discharge relation for the turbines. A multimethodology is proposed for determining the apparent surface roughness value (ε) by means of friction factor f and measuring arithmetic mean deviation of the roughness profile (Ra), root mean square roughness (Rq) and peak and valley roughness (Rz). It is found that a surface roughness value (ε) of 0.3mm can be used for calcinated surfaces which is much higher than steel surfaces but smaller than concrete.

Abstract

When highly calcinated water is transferred through the penstock of a hydropower plant it leaves a residue on the pipe surface. Accumulated residue over time causes a change in the roughness of the pipe surface thus friction losses in the system. The effect is a change in head and discharge relation for the turbines. A multimethodology is proposed for determining the apparent surface roughness value (ε) by means of friction factor f and measuring arithmetic mean deviation of the roughness profile (Ra), root mean square roughness (Rq) and peak and valley roughness (Rz). It is found that a surface roughness value (ε) of 0.3mm can be used for calcinated surfaces which is much higher than steel surfaces but smaller than concrete.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇELEBİOĞLU, K. (2019). Roughness Coefficient of a Highly Calcinated Penstock. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 9309–9325. https://ajindex.com/articles/51241

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Kumar, R., Singal, S.K., Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52(C), 240-255, 2015.
  2. Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., & Okiishi, T. H. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons., 2006
  3. Gilley, J. E., Kottwitz, E. R., Wieman, G. A., Roughness Coefficients for Selected Residue Materials, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.,117, 503–514., 1991
  4. Weisbach, J., Lehrbuch der Ingenieur- und Maschinen-Mechanik, Vol. 1.Theoretische Mechanik, Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig., 1845. Darcy, H. Recherches expérimentales relatives au mouvement de l'eau dans les tuyaux, Mallet-Bachelier, Paris. 268 pages and atlas, 1857 Colebrook, C. F. and White, C. M., Experiments with fluid- friction in roughened pipes., Proc. Royal Soc. London, 161, 367-381, 1937.
  5. Moody, L. F., Friction factors for pipe flow. Trans. ASME, 66,671-678, 1944.
  6. Swamee, P. K., and Jain, A. K., Explicit equations for pipe-flow problems., J. Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 102(5), 657-664, 1976.
  7. Drtina P and Sallaberger M, Hydraulic turbines—basic principles and state-of-the-art computational fluid dynamics applications, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 213(1), 85 – 102, 1999
  8. Celebioglu K, Altintas B, Aradag S, Tascioglu Y, Numerical research of cavitation on Francis turbine runners, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42(28), 17771-17781, 2017
  9. Ayancik F, Acar E, Celebioglu K, Aradag S, Simulation-based design and optimization of Francis turbine runners by using multiple types of metamodels, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 231 (8), 1427-1444, 2017
  10. Ayli E, Celebioglu K, Aradag S, Computational Fluid dynamics based hill chart construction and similarity study of prototype and model francis turbines for experimental tests 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Costa de Sol, 2016
  11. Celebioglu K, Aradag S, Ayli E, Altintas B, Rehabilitation of Francis Turbines of Power Plants with Computational Methods, Hittite Journal of Science & Engineering 5 (1), 37-48, 2018
  12. Kavurmaci B, Celebioglu K, Aradag S, Tascioglu Y, Model Testing of Francis-Type Hydraulic Turbines, Measurement and Control 50 (3), 70-73, 2017 TUBİTAK MAM Enerji Enstitüsü, “MİLHES Türbin Verim Ölçüm Raporu”, MLS.İP11.D.80.3009.V30, Elektrik Üretim Anonim Şirketi (EÜAŞ), 2018.
  13. Hoffs, A., Dr