Dergiler / European Journal of Breast Health / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project

Sayfa
117–122
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

More research is needed to better estimate life-years saved with screening and further validate the findings of our study

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: We used the results from the first three screening rounds of Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project (BMSP), a 10-year (20092019) and the first organized population-based screening program implemented in a county of Istanbul, Turkey, to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of a population-based mammography screening program in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Two screening strategies were compared: BMSP and Turkish National Breast Cancer Registry Program (TNBCRP) which includes no organized population-based screening.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:More research is needed to better estimate life-years saved with screening and further validate the findings of our study
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: We used the results from the first three screening rounds of Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project (BMSP), a 10-year (20092019) and the first organized population-based screening program implemented in a county of Istanbul, Turkey, to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of a population-based mammography screening program in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Two screening strategies were compared: BMSP and Turkish National Breast Cancer Registry Program (TNBCRP) which includes no organized population-based screening. Costs were estimated using direct data from the BMSP project and the reimbursement rates of Turkish Social Security Administration. The life-years saved by BMSP were estimated using the stage distribution observed with BMSP and TNBCRP. Results: A total of 67 women (out of 7234 screened women) were diagnosed with breast cancer in BMSP. The stage distribution for AJCC stages O, I, II, III, IV was 19.4%, 50.8%, 20.9%, 7.5%, 1.5% and 4.9%, 26.6%, 44.9%, 20.8%, 2.8% with BMSP and TNBCRP, respectively. The BMSP program is expected to save 279.46 life years over TNBCRP with an additional cost of $677.171, which implies an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2.423 per saved life year. Since the ICER is smaller than the Gross Demostic Product (GDP) per capita in Turkey ($10.515 in 2014), BMSP program is highly cost-effective and remains cost-effective in the sensitivity analysis.Conclusion: Mammography screening may change the stage distribution of breast cancer in Turkey. Furthermore, an organized population-based screening program may be cost-effective in Turkey and in other developing countries. More research is needed to better estimate life-years saved with screening and further validate the findings of our study

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYHAN, A., ÖZMEN, V., ALAGÖZ, O., ÖZAYDIN, A. N., SAİP, P., CABİOĞLU, N., ÖZCİNAR, B., ARIBAL, E., SAHİN, C., GÜRDAL, S. Ö. (2022). Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project. European Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 117–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/510879

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. L. Nyström, S. Wall, L.E. Rutqvist, A. Lindgren, M. Lindqvist, S. Rydén, J. Andersson, N. Bjurstam, G. Fagerberg, J. Frisell, L. Tabár, L.-G. Larsson. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. The Lancet 1993
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, Broeders MJ, Boer R, Hendriks JH, Verbeek AL, de Koning HJ. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. The Lancet 2003
  3. (PMID: 12727393) [CrossRef] 3. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004
  4. (PMID:15337416) [CrossRef] 4. Bray F, Ferlay J, Laversanne M, Brewster DH, Gombe Mbalawa C, Kohler B, Piñeros M, Steliarova-Foucher E, Swaminathan R, Antoni S, Soerjomataram I, Forman D. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents: Inclusion criteria, highlights from Volume X and the global status of cancer registration. Int J Cancer 2015
  5. (PMID:26135522) [CrossRef] 5. Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, Boyle P. Cancer incidence in five continents, Volume IX: IARC Press, International Agency for Research on Cancer
  6. Parkin D, Ferlay J, Whelan S, Storm H: Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. 1: Diamond Pocket Books (P) Ltd.
  7. Fidaner C, Eser SY, Parkin DM. Incidence in Izmir in 1993-1994: first results from Izmir Cancer Registry. Eur J Cancer 2001
  8. [CrossRef ] 8. Ozmen V. Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients). Eur J Breast Health 2014
  9. (PMID:28331652) [CrossRef] 9. Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Dunn NA, Muller JM, Pyke CM, Baade PD. The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol 2012
  10. (PMID:22459198) [CrossRef] 10. Ozmen V. Breast cancer in the world and Turkey. Eur J Breast Health 2008
  11. Dündar PE, Özmen D, Öztürk B, Haspolat G, Akyıldız F, Çoban S, Çakıroğlu G. The knowledge and attitudes of breast self-examination and mammography in a group of women in a rural area in western Turkey. BMC cancer 2006
  12. (PMID:16504119) [CrossRef] 12. Ozmen V, Boylu S, Ok E, Canturk NZ, Celik V, Kapkac M, Girgin S, Tireli M, Ihtiyar E, Demircan O, Baskan MS, Koyuncu A, Tasdelen I, Dumanli E