Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Sexual dimorphism in the sheep corpus callosum using 3 tesla MRI

Sayfa
225–234
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: It is thought that the findings obtained from healthy sheep brains in this study can be used in neurodegenerative disease models created in sheep in neuroscience studies and experimental studies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study aims to determine the morphological and morphometric differences of the corpus callosum in terms of sex using high-resolution images obtained from formalin-fixed sheep brains by 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: In the study, a total of 18 adult healthy Akkaraman sheep brains (9 females and 9 males), which had no anomaly and were fixed with formaldehyde, were used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: It is thought that the findings obtained from healthy sheep brains in this study can be used in neurodegenerative disease models created in sheep in neuroscience studies and experimental studies.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to determine the morphological and morphometric differences of the corpus callosum in terms of sex using high-resolution images obtained from formalin-fixed sheep brains by 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: In the study, a total of 18 adult healthy Akkaraman sheep brains (9 females and 9 males), which had no anomaly and were fixed with formaldehyde, were used. Morphometric measurements in sheep brains were performed on T2-weighted images obtained from 3T MRI. First, the midsagittal cross-sectional area of the corpus callosum was calculated using MIMICS. Before morphometric measurements, images were converted from DICOM format to NIfTI format in the MRcronGL. Then, the normalization of the images were performed using the standard template in the ITK-SNAP. After that images were opened in the ITK-SNAP, and morphometric measurements were performed in genu corporis callosi, truncus corporis callosi, and splenium corporis callosi. Results: In sheep, the lower surface of the truncus corporis callosi, which forms the roof of the ventriculus lateralis, was more concave than dog and cat, and flatter than human, horse and rabbit. There was no sexual dimorphism in corpus callosum length, midsagittal corpus callosum cross-sectional area, genu corporis callosi width, truncus corporis callosi width and splenium corporis callosi width. Similarly, no sexual dimorphism was observed in the ratio between midsagittal corpus callosum cross-sectional area and brain weight and volume. However, it was observed that the ratio between surface area and volume was very close to the difference frequently encountered in this parameter in studies conducted in humans and other mammals. Conclusion: It is thought that the findings obtained from healthy sheep brains in this study can be used in neurodegenerative disease models created in sheep in neuroscience studies and experimental studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aydoğdu, S., Koplay, M., Eken, E. (2022). Sexual dimorphism in the sheep corpus callosum using 3 tesla MRI. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 225–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/509765

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Al-Hadidi MT, Kalbouneh HM, Ramzy A, Al Sharei A, et al., 2021. Gender and age-related differences in the morphometry of corpus callosum: MRI study. Eur J Anat, 25(1), 15-24.
  2. Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Boudos R, et al., 2007. Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum in Autism. Neuroimage, 34 (1), 61-73.
  3. Allouh MZ, Al Barbarawi MM, Ali HA, Mustafa AG, et al., 2020. Morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum according to age and sex in Middle Eastern Arabs: racial comparisons and clinical correlations to autism spectrum disorder. Front Syst Neurosci, 14, 1-11.
  4. Ardekani BA, Figarsky K, Sidtis JJ, 2013. Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum: an MRI study using the OASIS brain database. Cereb cortex, 23 (10), 2514-2520.
  5. Aydınlıoglu A, Arslan K, Ragbetli MÇ, Erdogan AR, et al., S, 2000. Sex differences in dog corpus callosum. Eur J Morphol, 38(1), 63-67.
  6. Bishop KM, Wahlsten D, 1997. Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: myth or reality? Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 21(5), 581-601.
  7. Braak H, Braak E, Strothjohann M, 1994. Abnormally phosphorylated tau protein related to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads in the cerebral cortex of sheep and goat. Neurosci Lett, 171(1-2), 1-4.
  8. Capitanio JP, Emborg ME, 2008. Contributions of non-human primates to neuroscience research. Lancet, 371(9618), 1126-1135.
  9. DeLacoste-Utamsing C, Holloway RL, 1982. Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science, 216(4553), 1431-1432. Desimone R, 1992. The physiology of memory: recordings of things past. Science, 258, 245-246.
  10. Di Paola M, Spalletta G, Caltagirone C, 2010. In vivo structural neuroanatomy of corpus callosum in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using different MRI techniques: a review. J Alzheimers Dis, 20(1), 67-95.
  11. Di Paola M, Luders E, Cherubini A, Sanchez-Castaneda C, et al., 2012. Multimodal MRI analysis of the corpus callosum reveals white matter differences in presymptomatic and early Huntington's disease. Cereb cortex, 22(12), 2858- 2866. Downhill Jr JE, Buchsbaum MS, Wei T, Spiegel-Cohen J, et al., 2000. Shape and size of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia and schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophr Res, 42(3), 193-208. Dursun N, 2008. Veteriner Anatomi III. Seventh edition, Me-disan Press,
  12. Ankara, Turkey, pp; 1-89.
  13. Ella A, Keller M, 2015. Construction of an MRI 3D high resolution sheep brain template. Magn Reson Imaging, 33(10), 1329-1337.
  14. Franklin MS, Kraemer GW, Shelton SE, Baker E, et al