Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Utilization of Advanced Molecular Analyses in ClinicalPractice in Lung Cancer: A Country Perspective

Sayfa
347–353
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However,the limited availability and delays in results lead oncologists to initiate treatment primarily based on clinical findings.Once these methods become widespread, targeted therapies and consequent favorable outcomes will increase in thepractice of oncology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study evaluated the clinical practices of medical oncologists in Turkey for utilization of molecular andgenetic analyses in lung cancer.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Participants were 189 medical oncologists.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However,the limited availability and delays in results lead oncologists to initiate treatment primarily based on clinical findings.Once these methods become widespread, targeted therapies and consequent favorable outcomes will increase in thepractice of oncology.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the clinical practices of medical oncologists in Turkey for utilization of molecular andgenetic analyses in lung cancer. Methods: All medical oncologists registered to the Turkish Medical Oncology Society participated in an online surveyabout their practices of molecular and genetic analyses for management of lung cancer patients. Results: Participants were 189 medical oncologists. Results showed that 88.4% checked mutations in adenocancer,75.7% checked EGFR, EML-ALK, and ROS-1 in NSCLC, 75.1% checked markers only for locally advanced/metastatic dis eases; 45% obtained results in 8–14 days and 31.2% in 15–21 days. A positive EGFR/ALK report after initiating chemoled 68.3% to re-evaluate patient after 2/3 cycles, 20.6% to stop chemo and shift to targeted therapy and 12.2% tocontinue full-regimen. Of the participants, 46% requested secondary biopsy in progressions under treatment, 22.2%in young patients, 34.9% in never-smokers, 46.6% in patients testing negative but presumed to be clinically positive. Conclusion: Most medical oncologists in Turkey use molecular/genetic analyses in their clinical practice. However,the limited availability and delays in results lead oncologists to initiate treatment primarily based on clinical findings.Once these methods become widespread, targeted therapies and consequent favorable outcomes will increase in thepractice of oncology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYYILDIZ, V. A., PETEKKAYA, H. İ. (2022). Utilization of Advanced Molecular Analyses in ClinicalPractice in Lung Cancer: A Country Perspective. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 347–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/508575

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Santarpia L, Qi Y, Stemke-Hale K, Wang B, Young EJ, Booser DJ, et al. Mutation profiling identifies numerous rare drug targets and distinct mutation patterns in different clinical subtypes of breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Threat 2012;134:333-43
  2. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Math M, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366:883-92. [CrossRef] 3. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74. [CrossRef] 4. Van Allen EM, Wagle N, Levy MA. Clinical analysis and interpretation of cancer genome data. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:1825-33
  3. Ellis MJ, Perou CM. The genomic landscape of breast cancer as a therapeutic roadmap. Cancer Discov 2013;3:27-34. [CrossRef] 6. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-E86. [CrossRef] 7. Sung MR, Ellis PM, Verma S, Duncan E, Leighl NB. Approach to biomarker testing: perspectives from various specialties. Curr Oncol 2016;23:178-83. [CrossRef] 8. Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, Chen YM, Park K, Kim SW, et al. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:528-38
  4. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2380- 8. [CrossRef] 10. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crino L, Ahn MJ, et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2385-94. [CrossRef] 11. Jänne PA, Shaw AT, Pereira JR, Jeannin G, Vansteenkiste J, Barrios C, et al. Selumetinib plus docetaxel for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:38-47. [CrossRef] 12. Spigel DR, Ervin TJ, Ramlau RA, Daniel DB, Goldschmidt JH, Blumenschein GR, et al. Randomized phase II trial of onartuzumab in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:4105-14
  5. Shaw AT, Ou S-HI, Bang Y-J, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, Salgia R, et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non–small-cell