Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

Evaluation of hard palate asymmetry in turkish population

Sayfa
980–986
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Determining the greater palatine foramen's location according to anatomical structures will contribute to determining the location of the greater palatine foramen in surgical interventions to be performed in this region.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: In a sample of the Turkish population, we aimed to evaluate differences in hard palate asymmetry by sex, the direction of right- left dominance, and how hard palate asymmetry and morphometric measurements are shaped with age.Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 3-dimensional computed tomography images of the head and neckregion belonging to 172 (88 males, 84 females) individuals aged between 20-89 years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The asymmetry ratio was determined as a percentage using the asymmetry index.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Determining the greater palatine foramen's location according to anatomical structures will contribute to determining the location of the greater palatine foramen in surgical interventions to be performed in this region.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: In a sample of the Turkish population, we aimed to evaluate differences in hard palate asymmetry by sex, the direction of right- left dominance, and how hard palate asymmetry and morphometric measurements are shaped with age.Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 3-dimensional computed tomography images of the head and neckregion belonging to 172 (88 males, 84 females) individuals aged between 20-89 years. In this study, the distances between the Incisive foramen-Greater palatine foramen, Greater palatine foramen-Posterior nasal spine on the right and left sides with regard to the hard palate were measured. The asymmetry ratio was determined as a percentage using the asymmetry index. Furthermore, the angle values between the Incisive foramen-Posterior nasal spine-Greater palatine foramen on the right and left sides were measured on the lines between the measured points and compared with each other.Results: The measured parameters were compared between sexes, higher linear measurement parameters were found in males;angular values and the asymmetry index were close to each other, and no difference was found between them. When a comparison was made between the sides, the difference was revealed only in the measurement of the Greater palatine foramen-Posterior nasal spine, and the right side was larger. In all cases, the right side was larger in 79 cases in the Incisive foramen-Greater palatine foramen asymmetry index, and in 93 cases, the asymmetry was to the left. In the Greater palatine foramen-Posterior nasal spine asymmetry index, it was found that the asymmetry was to the right in 61 cases, and the asymmetry was to the left in 111 cases. Conclusion: This study provided important data on the hard palate morphology of the Turkish population. It also presentedanthropological references for hard palate measurements of the Turkish population. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography images, we determined the greater palatine foramen's location according to the posterior nasal spine and incisive foramen. Determining the greater palatine foramen's location according to anatomical structures will contribute to determining the location of the greater palatine foramen in surgical interventions to be performed in this region.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Dursun, A., Ayyildiz, V. A. (2022). Evaluation of hard palate asymmetry in turkish population. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 980–986. https://ajindex.com/articles/445735

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Zaidel DW, Cohen JA. The face, beauty, and symmetry: Perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces. Int J Neurosci 2005;115:1165-73
  2. Al-Zubair NM. Dental arch asymmetry. Eur J Dent 2014;8:224-8
  3. Maurice TJ, Kula K. Dental arch asymmetry in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 1998;68:37-44
  4. Trpkova B, Major P, Nebbe B, et al. Craniofacial asymmetry and temporomandibular joint internal derangement in female adolescents: A posteroanterior cephalometric study. Angle Orthod 2000;70:81-8
  5. Berge JK, Bergman RA. Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull. Clin Anat 2001;6:406-13
  6. Moreira RS, Sgrott EA, Seiji F, et al. Biometry of hard palate on digital photographs: a methodology for quantitative measurements. Int J Morphol 2006;24:19-23
  7. Moreira RS, Sgrott EA, Stuker H, et al. Palatal asymmetry during development: an anatomical study. Clin Anat 2008;21:398-404 8. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthod 2003;73:381-5
  8. Kronmiller JE. Development of asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:134-7
  9. Sheats RD, McGorray SP, Musmar Q, et al. Prevalence of orthodontic asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:138- 45
  10. Masuoka N, Momoi Y, Ariji Y, et al. Can cephalometric indices and subjective evaluation be consistent for facial asymmetry? Angle Orthod 2005;75:651-5
  11. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod 1991;61:43- 8
  12. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:212-20
  13. Chebib F, Chamma A. Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod 1981;51:214-26
  14. Quimby ML, Vig KWL, Rashid RG, et al. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer- based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303
  15. Sutton PR. Lateral facial asymmetry-methods of assessment. Angle Orthod 1968;38:82-92
  16. Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod 1978;48:141-8
  17. Farkas LG, Cheung G. Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod 1981;51:70-7
  18. Howard-Swirzinski K, Edwards PC, Saini TS, et al. Length and geometric patterns of the greater palatine canal observed in cone beam computed tomography. Int J Dent 2010;Special issue:1-6 20. Sharma NA, Garud RS Greater palatine foramen– key to successful hemimaxillary anaesthesia: a morphom