Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Higher Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) Levels AreAssociated With Poorer Survival In Immunotherapy-TreatedMelanoma Patients

Sayfa
409–413
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The SII could be a valu able biomarker for prognosis estimation in ICI-treated melanoma patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Peripheral blood-based markers like the systemic inflammation index is (SII) could be valuable for mela noma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), although the data is limited.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The data of 44 advanced adult melanoma patients treated with ICIs (ipilimumab or nivolumab) were retro spectively evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The SII could be a valu able biomarker for prognosis estimation in ICI-treated melanoma patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Peripheral blood-based markers like the systemic inflammation index is (SII) could be valuable for mela noma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), although the data is limited. We aimed to evaluate theassociation between the baseline SII with survival in ICI-treated melanoma patients. Methods: The data of 44 advanced adult melanoma patients treated with ICIs (ipilimumab or nivolumab) were retro spectively evaluated. The SII was calculated with the platelet*(neutrophil/lymphocyte) formula. The median value of SIIas the cut-off point. The association between SII values and survival were evaluated with univariate and multivariateanalyses. Results: The median age was 61 years (IQR 51-68), and 52.3% of the patients were male. During a median follow-upof 7.52 months, 35 patients died (79.5%), and 39 patients (88.6%) had any PFS event. The patients with higher SII val ues had decreased overall survival (OS) (11.203±2.491 vs. 5.520±2.063 months, p=0.015). In the multivariate analyses,including adjustments according to patient sex, age, and lactate dehydrogenase levels, patients with higher SII valueshad decreased OS (HR: 2.209, 95% CI: 1.105-4.417, p=0.025). Conclusion: In our experience, melanoma patients with higher SII values had poorer survival. The SII could be a valu able biomarker for prognosis estimation in ICI-treated melanoma patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇELİK, İ., KILIÇKAP, S., GÜVEN, D. C., AKTEPE, O. H., YILDIRIM, H. Ç. (2022). Higher Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) Levels AreAssociated With Poorer Survival In Immunotherapy-TreatedMelanoma Patients. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 409–413. https://ajindex.com/articles/508569

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Kruger S, Ilmer M, Kobold S, Cadilha BL, Endres S, Ormanns S, et al. Advances in cancer immunotherapy 2019 - latest trends. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010
  3. Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Robert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2019
  5. Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, Ribas A. Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell 2017
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, Lamine F, Maillard M, Fraga M, et al. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Tran G, Zafar SY. Financial toxicity and implications for cancer care in the era of molecular and immune therapies. Ann Transl Med 2018
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Guven DC, Sahin TK, Dizdar O, Kilickap S. Predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status and future perspectives. Biomark Med 2020
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, et al
  10. KEYNOTE-024 Investigators. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2016
  11. [CrossRef] 10. Adashek JJ, Subbiah V, Kurzrock R. From tissue-agnostic to n-of-one therapies: (r)evolution of the precision paradigm. Trends Cancer 2021
  12. [CrossRef] 11. Shen X, Zhao B. Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis. BMJ 2018
  13. k3529. [CrossRef] 12. Kim JY, Kronbichler A, Eisenhut M, Hong SH, van der Vliet HJ, Kang J, et al. Tumor mutational burden and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019
  14. [CrossRef] 13. Guven DC, Yildirim HC, Bilgin E, Aktepe OH, Taban H, Sahin TK, et al. PILE: a candidate prognosti