KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Are the Judicial Reports Prepared in Emergency Services Consistent with Those Prepared in Forensic Medicine Department of a University Hospital?

Seval KUL
Yusuf ATAN
Murat AKBABA
Zekeriya TATAROĞLU
Mehmet KARASU
Mustafa Kenan ASILDAĞ
Veysal DAŞ
Sayfa
79–85
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, it should be kept in mind that this tendency may not protect the physician, butalso may cause additional legal problems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study aimed to analyze the judicial reports prepared in emergency services and to emphasize the importance of forensicmedicine education for the physicians working at these services and the reflection of the situation to the judicial authorities.Materials and Methods: Reports prepared by Forensic Medicine Department of Gaziantep University Medical Faculty were accepted as thegold standard and the judicial reports of the same patients prepared in emergency services were compared retrospectively.Results: Most reports were found to be prepared as temporary reports.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The success rate ofidentifying cases with and without life-threatening clinical status in emergency services was 83.49% and 85.52%, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, it should be kept in mind that this tendency may not protect the physician, butalso may cause additional legal problems.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to analyze the judicial reports prepared in emergency services and to emphasize the importance of forensicmedicine education for the physicians working at these services and the reflection of the situation to the judicial authorities.Materials and Methods: Reports prepared by Forensic Medicine Department of Gaziantep University Medical Faculty were accepted as thegold standard and the judicial reports of the same patients prepared in emergency services were compared retrospectively.Results: Most reports were found to be prepared as temporary reports. The concepts of general condition, consciousness, life-threateningclinical status and simple medical interventions were frequently mentioned, while other concepts were not mentioned. The success rate ofidentifying cases with and without life-threatening clinical status in emergency services was 83.49% and 85.52%, respectively. The successrate of identifying cases that could and could not be treated with simple medical intervention was 84.20% and 58.62%, respectively.Conclusion: It has been determined that the problems in both mentioning basic concepts and accurate report writing cannot be solvedin the judicial reports organized in emergency departments. In order to protect themselves, physicians have a tendency to report theconsequences more severe than they actually are. However, it should be kept in mind that this tendency may not protect the physician, butalso may cause additional legal problems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUL, S., ATAN, Y., AKBABA, M., TATAROĞLU, Z., KARASU, M., ASILDAĞ, M. K., DAŞ, V. (2022). Are the Judicial Reports Prepared in Emergency Services Consistent with Those Prepared in Forensic Medicine Department of a University Hospital?. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 79–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/507992

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Young G. Psychiatric/psychological forensic report writing. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;49:214-20
  2. Korkmaz T, Kahramansoy N, Erkol Z, Sarıçil F, Kılıç A. Evaluation of the forensic patients presenting to the emergency department and legal reports. Med Bull Haseki. 2012;50:14-20
  3. Küçük E, Günel C. Demographic characteristics of forensic investigation in emergency service. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2016;6:100-5
  4. Serinken M, Türkçüer İ, Acar K, Özen M. Evaluation of medicolegal reports written by physicians in the emergency unit with regard to deficiencies and mistakes. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011;17:23-8
  5. Christensen AM, Crowder CM, Ousley SD, Houck MM. Error and its meaning in forensic science. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:123-6
  6. Güven FMK, Bütün C, Beyaztaş FY, Eren ŞH, Korkmaz İ. Evaluation of forensic cases admitted to Cumhuriyet University hospital. Meandros Med Dent J. 2009;10:23-8
  7. Yavuz MF, Yavuz MS. Standardization and deficiencies of forensic reports. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Surgical Medical Sciences. 2006;2:28-33
  8. Serinken M, Çımrın A, Ergör A, Cimilli C, Bengi F. Burnout syndrome and emergency service physicians. Toplum ve Hekim. 2002;17:358-65
  9. Fedakar R, Aydiner AH, Ercan İ. A comparison of “life threatening injury” concept in the Turkish Penal Code and trauma scoring systems. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007;13:192-8
  10. Yavuz MS, Aydın S. Forensic cases and reports in primary health care. Turkish Journal of Family Practice. 2007;8:30-3
  11. Hon KL, Leung TF, Cheung KL, Nip SY, Ng J, Fok TF et al. Severe childhood injuries and poisoning in a densely populated city: Where do they occur and what type? J Crit Care. 2010;25:175
  12. Sever M, Saz EU, Koşargelir M. An evaluation of the pediatric medico-legal admissions to a tertiary hospital emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010;16:260-7
  13. Çetinel Y, Gülalp B, Karagün Ö, Örel Ö, Seçkin TD, Aldinç H, et al. Pediatric cases that composed temporary legal report; whom? when? JAEM. 2013;12:113-7
  14. Çolak B, Demirbaş İ, Albayrak Ü. The importance of temporary forencis reports. STED Dergisi. 2005;14:161-4
  15. Naveen S, Kumar MV. Preparing medico legal report in clinical practice. Indian J Surg. 2013;75:47-9
  16. Griffith EE, Stankovic A, Baranoski M. Conceptualizing the forensic psychiatry report as performative narrative. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;38:32-42
  17. Howes LM, Kirkbride KP, Kelty SF, Julian R, Kemp N. The readability of expert r