Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

A comparison of the in vivo neoendothelialization and wound healing processes of three atrial septal defect occluders used during childhood in a nonrandomized prospective trial

Sayfa
229–234
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although the different manufacturing features were claimed to facilitate of neoendothelialization, no differences were observed among the three devices 1 month following the procedure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: We prospectively investigated the neoendothelialization of transcatheter secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in children receiving one of three different occluders.Methods: Transcatheter ASD closure was performed for 44 children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Markers of the three phases of wound healing were studied in all patients before and on the 1st and 10th days and 1st month post intervention.Results: The mean age of children was 7.08±3.51 years, and the mean weight was 26.07±15.07 kg.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although the different manufacturing features were claimed to facilitate of neoendothelialization, no differences were observed among the three devices 1 month following the procedure.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: We prospectively investigated the neoendothelialization of transcatheter secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in children receiving one of three different occluders.Methods: Transcatheter ASD closure was performed for 44 children. The patients were divided into three groups: group I: Amplatzer, group II: Lifetech CeraFlex, and group III: Occlutech Figulla Flex II septal occluder. The data were prospectively analyzed. Markers of the three phases of wound healing were studied in all patients before and on the 1st and 10th days and 1st month post intervention.Results: The mean age of children was 7.08±3.51 years, and the mean weight was 26.07±15.07 kg. The mean ASD diameter was 12.65±3.50 mm. Groups I, II, and III comprised 34.1%, 31.8%, and 34.1% patients, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding patient number, age, defect size, device diameter, or total septum/device ratio (p> 0.05). Inflammatory and proliferative phase marker levels increased following the procedure (p< 0.05). However, scar formation markers did not change after 1 month. No significant differences in neoendothelializaton were observed among the different occluders (p> 0.05).Conclusion: All three devices were composed of nitinol with different surface coating techniques. Although the different manufacturing features were claimed to facilitate of neoendothelialization, no differences were observed among the three devices 1 month following the procedure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAHİN, D. A., BAŞPINAR, O., SÜLÜ, A., KARSLIGİL, T., KUL, S. (2017). A comparison of the in vivo neoendothelialization and wound healing processes of three atrial septal defect occluders used during childhood in a nonrandomized prospective trial. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 229–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/365384

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Huang Y, Kong JF, Venkatraman SS. Biomaterials and design in occlusion devices for cardiac defects: a review. Acta Biomater 2014; 10: 1088-101
  2. Ries MW, Kampmann C, Rupprecht HJ, Hintereder G, Hafner G, Meyer J. Nickel release after implantation of the Amplatzer occluder. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 737-41
  3. Anzai H, Child J, Natterson B, Krivokapich J, Fishbein MC, Chan VK, et al. Incidence of thrombus formation on the CardioSEAL and the Amplatzer interatrial closure devices. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 426-31
  4. Sigler M, Jux C, Ewert P. Histopathological workup of an Amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder after surgical removal. Pediatr Cardiol 2006; 27: 775-6
  5. Sigler M, Jux C. Biocompatibility of septal defect closure devices. Heart 2007; 93: 444-9
  6. Foth R, Quentin T, Michel-Behnke I, Vogt M, Kriebel T, Kreischer A, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of neotissues and tissue reactions to septal defect-occlusion devices. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 90-6
  7. Zhang D, Zhang Z, Zi Z, Zhang Y, Zeng W, Chu PK. Fabrication of graded TiN coatings on nitinol occluders and effects on in vivo nickel release. Biomed Mater Eng 2008; 18: 387-93
  8. Kong H, Wilkinson JL, Coe JY, Gu X, Urness M, Kim TH, et al. Corresive behavior of Amplatzer devices in experimental and biological enviroments. Cardiol Young 2002; 12: 260-5
  9. Krizanic F, Sievert H, Pfeiffer D, Konorza T, Ferrari M, Hijazi Z, et al. The Occlutech Figulla PFO and ASD occluder: a new nitinol wire mesh device for closure of atrial septal defects. J Invasive Cardiol 2010; 22: 182-7
  10. Fizser R, Szkutnik M, Chodor B, Bialkowski J. Preliminary experience in the use of CERA Occluders for closure of different intracardiac and extracardiac shunts. J Invasive Cardiol 2014; 26: 385-8
  11. Sinno H, Prakash S. Complements and the wound healing cascade: an updated review. Plast Surg Int 2013; 2013: 146764
  12. Demidova-Rice TN, Hamblin MR, Herman IM. Acute and impaired wound healing: pathophysiology and current methods for drug delivery, part 1: normal and chronic wounds: biology, causes, and approaches to care. Adv Skin Wound Care 2012; 25: 304-14 13. Reinke JM, Sorg H. Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res 2012; 49: 35-43
  13. Mirastschijski U, Schnabel R, Claes J, Schneider W, Agren MS, Haaksma C, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition delays wound healing and blocks latent transforming growth factor-?1 promoted myofibroblast formation and function. Wound Repair Regen 2010; 18: 223-3