KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 61

Psychometric Characteristics of the Social Justice Scale's Turkish Form and A Structural Equation Modeling

İlker CIRIK
Sayfa
23–44
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Findings and Results: Linguistic equivalence of the scale was obtained p=.00, p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In order to provide equal educational opportunities for students, teachers should encourage their students to have an effective voice concerning social justice.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Method: The scale adaptation process was conducted with 515 participants (376 female, 139 male), and structural equation modeling was conducted with 410 (313 female, 97 male) participants.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Findings and Results: Linguistic equivalence of the scale was obtained p=.00, p
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In order to provide equal educational opportunities for students, teachers should encourage their students to have an effective voice concerning social justice. Studies reveal that teachers face trouble when transferring from the concept of social justice as theory to social justice as practice. A scale which will be developed on social justice may enable teachers to better comprehend the process of movement from attitude to action. Moreover, examining which factors affect teachers' behaviors towards social justice will contribute to the arrangement of social justice studies in learning environments. Purpose of the Study: The primary aim of the study is to analyze the psychometric characteristics of the Social Justice Scale's Turkish form. The secondary aim is to determine the effects of social justice attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control on behavioral intentions. Method: The scale adaptation process was conducted with 515 participants (376 female, 139 male), and structural equation modeling was conducted with 410 (313 female, 97 male) participants. The data were collected through the Social Justice Scale. In analyzing the data, Pearson Correlation Coefficients, confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach Alpha coefficients were utilized. The effects of social justice attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control on behavioral intentions were analyzed through structural equation modeling. Findings and Results: Linguistic equivalence of the scale was obtained p=.00, p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CIRIK, İ. (2022). Psychometric Characteristics of the Social Justice Scale's Turkish Form and A Structural Equation Modeling. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 61, 23–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/507281

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
  2. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  3. Aydin, H., & Tonbuloglu, B. (2014). Graduate students perceptions' on multicultural education: A qualitative case study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 29-50.
  4. Banks, J.A. (2009). Human rights, diversity, and citizenship education. The Educational Forum, 73, 100-110.
  5. Bell, L.A. (2007). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L.A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 1-14). NY: Taylor & Francis. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
  6. Bradley, J.M., Werth, J.L., & Hastings, S.L. (2012). Social justice advocacy in rural communities: Practical issues and implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 40, 363-384.
  7. Brown, K.D., & Brown, A.L. (2011). Teaching k-8 students about race: African Americans, racism, and the struggle for social justice in the U.S. Multicultural Education, 19(1), 9-13.
  8. Brown, T.A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. NY: The Guilford Press.
  9. Capper, C.A., & Young, M.D. (2014). Ironies and limitations of educational leadership for social justice: A call to social justice educators. Theory Into Practice, 53, 158-164.
  10. Colquitt, J. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
  11. Constantine, M.G., Hage, S.M., Kindaichi, M.M., & Bryant, R.M. (2007). Social justice and multicultural issues: Implications for the practice and training of counselors and counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85, 24-29.
  12. Ersoy, A.F. (2014). Active and democratic citizenship education and its challenges in social studies classrooms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 1-20.
  13. Fouad, N.A., Gerstein, L.H., & Toporek, R.L. (2006). Social justice and counseling psychology in context. In R.L. Toporek, L.H. Gerstein, N.A. Fouad, G. Roysircar, & T. Israel (Eds.), Handbook for social justice in counseling psychology: Leadership, vision, and action (pp. 1-16). London: Sage Publications. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in