Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 74

Analysis of EFL Teachers’ Use of Digital Components: Evidence from Self-Report and Classroom Observation

Sayfa
41–60
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The availability of classrooms equipped withICT tools—including a computer with internet connection, a projector, and speakers for audio,as well as in-service training on the effective use of ICT tools at the host institution—promotepositive attitudes towards ICT among the teachers; therefore, these facilities should be madeavailable to EFL teachers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: A coursebook is ranked among thefundamentals of language teaching, which directlyaffects the success of classroom activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, investigations into the nature and efficiency of this relationship should yield invaluable insights to improving language teaching.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The availability of classrooms equipped withICT tools—including a computer with internet connection, a projector, and speakers for audio,as well as in-service training on the effective use of ICT tools at the host institution—promotepositive attitudes towards ICT among the teachers; therefore, these facilities should be madeavailable to EFL teachers.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: A coursebook is ranked among thefundamentals of language teaching, which directlyaffects the success of classroom activities. Therefore, investigations into the nature and efficiency of this relationship should yield invaluable insights to improving language teaching. In this regard, this study aims to investigate EFL teachers’ views regarding the necessity of such software, its actual use in teaching, and its perceived advantages. Methods: In this study, a mixed research design wasused, in which qualitative and quantitative researchmethods were used together.For these purposes, three different data collection tools were employed throughout this study:a) a survey, b) classroom observations, and c) post-observation interviews. First, a total of 74participants were surveyed, and then 14 of them were observed while teaching and wereinterviewed afterwards. Findings: Coursebook software was most commonly utilized withinlistening tasks and least commonly utilized in writing tasks. Active use time was observed tobe 143 minutes, which is 20% of the total teaching time. The passive use time of the tool wascalculated to be 511 minutes (73.5%), and the digital tool was turned off for a duration of 46minutes (6.5%). Semi-structured interviews revealed three main themes: attractivepresentation of the content, effective teaching, and classroom management. Implications forResearch and Practice: It is crucial to equip EFL teachers with the skills needed to employ thedigital components of coursebooks effectively. The availability of classrooms equipped withICT tools—including a computer with internet connection, a projector, and speakers for audio,as well as in-service training on the effective use of ICT tools at the host institution—promotepositive attitudes towards ICT among the teachers; therefore, these facilities should be madeavailable to EFL teachers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CİNKARA, E. (2022). Analysis of EFL Teachers’ Use of Digital Components: Evidence from Self-Report and Classroom Observation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 74, 41–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/507170

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Allen, C. (2015). Marriages of convenience? Teachers and coursebooks in the digital age. ELT Journal, 69(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv005
  2. Andrews, R. (2000). Learning, literacy and ICT: What’s the connection? English in Education, 34(3), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2000.tb00580.x
  3. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report a review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. Bax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4 System, 31(1), 13–28.
  4. Cinkara, E. (2016). An ethnographic investigation of activity modifications in EFL classrooms. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.01.010 Clyde, & A., L. (2004). Electronic whiteboards. Teacher Librarian, 32(1), 43–44.
  5. Cox, M., Cox, K., & Preston, C. (2000). What motivates teachers to use ICT? In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Education-line. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2012). ICT in ELT: how did we get here and where are we going? ELT Journal, 66(4), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs050
  7. Elaziz, M. (2008). Attitudes of students and teachers towards the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.thesis.bilkent.edu.tr/0003608.pdf
  8. Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Chajut, E. (2009). Changes over time in digital literacy. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(6), 713–715. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0264
  9. Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2–3, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  10. Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A “learning revolution”? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511099
  11. Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200115
  12. Gunduz, N. (2005). Computer assisted language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2),