Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 73

Undergraduate Students' Satisfaction Levels on the Quality of Faculty Life

Sayfa
1–18
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Students, who had a “very high” and “high”satisfaction level with their department choice, were observed to have higher satisfaction levelsabout faculty life quality than the students with “low” and “medium” satisfaction levels.Implications for Research and Practice: It was observed that Faculty Life Quality Scale totalscore differed according to gender, grade level, satisfaction level of department choice andperceived socio-economic status.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: School life quality influences students inmany ways with factors related to it.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For thisreason, the quality of life of the school needs to be taken seriously.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Students, who had a “very high” and “high”satisfaction level with their department choice, were observed to have higher satisfaction levelsabout faculty life quality than the students with “low” and “medium” satisfaction levels.Implications for Research and Practice: It was observed that Faculty Life Quality Scale totalscore differed according to gender, grade level, satisfaction level of department choice andperceived socio-economic status.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: School life quality influences students inmany ways with factors related to it. For thisreason, the quality of life of the school needs to be taken seriously. Satisfaction with school life can contribute to students' positive attitudes toward the school. When the relevant literature is examined, it is observed that a limited number of researches have been conducted in our country. Based on this reason, it has been decided to carry out this research. Research Methods: The screening model was used in the study. The studypopulation consists of year one, two and threeundergraduate students who didn’t receivepreparatory education and who study in YıldızTechnical University Faculty of Education. Thedata were collected through Faculty Life QualityScale (FLQS) and Personal information form. Findings: According to the study, it was observed that satisfaction level of faculty life qualitywas higher in female students than male students with respect to all the sub-dimensions, apartfrom the satisfaction of faculty sub-dimension, and total scale score. Student satisfaction levels,with respect to all the sub-dimensions and total scale score, were observed to be highest in yearone students; and lowest in year three students. Students, who had a “very high” and “high”satisfaction level with their department choice, were observed to have higher satisfaction levelsabout faculty life quality than the students with “low” and “medium” satisfaction levels.Implications for Research and Practice: It was observed that Faculty Life Quality Scale totalscore differed according to gender, grade level, satisfaction level of department choice andperceived socio-economic status.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARIDAĞ, N. Ç., AYDIN, M., AYDIN, R. (2022). Undergraduate Students' Satisfaction Levels on the Quality of Faculty Life. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 73, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/507151

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Alaca, F. (2011). İki dilli olan ve olmayan öğrencilerde okul yaşam kalitesi algısı ve okula aidiyet duygusu ilişkisi [The relationship between perceptions of quality of school life and sense of school belonging among bilingual and monolingual students]. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi,
  2. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Altas, D. (2006). Üniversite öğrencileri memnuniyet araştırması [University students’ satisfaction research]. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi. 11(1), 439-458.
  3. Aydin, S., Gormus, A. S. & Altintop, M. Y. (2014). Öğrencilerin memnuniyet düzeyleri ile demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin doğrusal olmayan kanonik korelasyon analizi ile incelenmesi: Meslek Yüksekokulu’nda bir uygulama [The relationship between the satisfaction level of students and their demographic features with non-linear canonical correlation analysis: An application in vocational high school]. AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 35-58.
  4. Ayik, A. & Atas-Akdemir, Ö. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının okul yaşam kalitesi ve okula yabancılaşma algıları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between pre- service teachers’ perceptions related to quality of school life and school alienation]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 21(4), 429-452.
  5. Barutcu-Yildirim, F., Yerin-Guneri, O. & Capa-Aydin, Y. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin memnuniyet düzeyi ve ilişkili değişkenler [University students’ satisfaction level and related variables]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(2), 521-533.
  6. Bilgic, S. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde okul yaşam kalitesi algısının arkadaşlara bağlılık ve empatik sınıf atmosferi değişkenleriyle ilişkisinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationships between the perception of school life quality and the variables of attachment to friends and empathic classroom atmosphere among elementary school students]. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi,
  7. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Buyukozturk, Ş., Kilic-Cakmak, E., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (Yirminci baskı). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Cokluk-Bokeoglu, O. & Yilmaz, K. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin fakülte yaşamının niteliğine ilişkin görüşlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of University Students’ Views about the Quality of Faculty Life Using Various Variables]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 179-204.
  9. Durmaz, A. (2008). Liselerde