KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90

In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about STEM Integration and Robotics Applications

Ahmet ILHAN SEN
Tugba YUKSEL
Ibrahim DELEN
Sayfa
243–268
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Data were gathered to find the differencesbetween teachers and future teachers from differentdisciplines (science and mathematics) with emphasison their views about STEM and roboticsimplementation

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: There are different perspectives aboutSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics) education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Understanding in-serviceand pre-service teachers’ views plays an importantrole in supporting K-12 students to choose careers inscience, technology and engineering.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Data were gathered to find the differencesbetween teachers and future teachers from differentdisciplines (science and mathematics) with emphasison their views about STEM and roboticsimplementation
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: There are different perspectives aboutSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics) education. Understanding in-serviceand pre-service teachers’ views plays an importantrole in supporting K-12 students to choose careers inscience, technology and engineering. This researchaims to understand science and mathematics inservice and pre-service teachers’ views about STEMintegration and robotics applications.Research Methods: The participants of this studywere 240 science and mathematics pre-serviceteachers and 27 science and mathematics in-serviceteachers. Participants answered open-endedquestions. Data were gathered to find the differencesbetween teachers and future teachers from differentdisciplines (science and mathematics) with emphasison their views about STEM and roboticsimplementation

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEN, A. I., YUKSEL, T., DELEN, I. (2022). In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about STEM Integration and Robotics Applications. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90, 243–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/507122

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Akgunduz, D. (2016). A Research about the Placement of the Top Thousand Students in STEM Fields in Turkey between 2000 and 2014.
  2. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1365-1377.
  3. Akgunduz, D., Aydeniz, M., CakmakCı, G., Cavas, B., Corlu, M. S., Oner, T., & Ozdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu. İstanbul:
  4. Scala Basım. Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6, 63-71.
  5. Altan, E. B., Yamak, H. & Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2016). Hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitiminde FETEMM eğitimi Uygulamaları: Tasarım temelli fen eğitimi [A Proposal of the STEM Education for Teacher Training: Design Based Science Education]. Trakya Journal of Education, 6(2), 212-232.
  6. Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.
  7. Babacan, T., & Sasmaz-Oren, F. (2017). Teknoloji destekli mikro öğretim uygulamalarinin fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarinin teknoloji kullanim algilari üzerine etkisi. [The effect of technology assisted micro teaching practices on prospective science teachers’ perceptions of technology usage]. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 193-214.
  8. Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering Curricula in Early Education: Describing the Landscape of Open Resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 2. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 12(5), 23–37.
  9. Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978–988.
  10. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112 (1), 3-11.
  11. Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(5), 7-11.
  12. Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349-352.
  13. Cinar, S., Pi