KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Risk Factors for Ultrasonographic GrafType IIa (−) Hips in Developmental Dysplasia: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study with Follow-Up Outcomes

İsmail Cengiz TUNCAY
Orçun ŞAHİN
Bahtiyar HABERAL
Sayfa
175–179
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, significant risk factors for Graftype IIa(-)should be remembered in clinical practice.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To examine the association of Graf type IIa(-) hips with maternal and infant risk factors in newborns and toevaluate the follow-up outcomes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The study population included 73 cases (11.4%) and 569 controls (88.6%), including 322 (50.2%) male and 320(49.8%) female infants.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, significant risk factors for Graftype IIa(-)should be remembered in clinical practice.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association of Graf type IIa(-) hips with maternal and infant risk factors in newborns and toevaluate the follow-up outcomes. Materials and Methods: Two different risk analyses were performed. In the first analysis, Graf type I hips were groupedas “controls,” and Graf type II were grouped as “cases.” In the second analysis, all the Graf type I and Type IIa(+) hips weregrouped as “controls,” and all Graf type IIa (-) hips were considered as “cases.” Maternal age, presence of consanguinity,pregnancy, and smoking were considered as maternal risk factors. Sex, birth weight, gestational age, associated congenitalanomalies, and family history were considered as infant risk factors. Further, we determined the risk factors for Graf type IIaand type IIa (-) hips. Results: The study population included 73 cases (11.4%) and 569 controls (88.6%), including 322 (50.2%) male and 320(49.8%) female infants. Graf type IIa hips revealed significant differences for gestational age (>42 wk), birthweight (>3500g), and maternal age (≤20 y). At follow-up, all Graf type IIa(+) hips became Graf type I mature hips. In contrast, three Graftype IIa(−) hips (3/12, 25%) required additional treatment. Conclusion: Significant risk factors for Graf type IIa(-) hips were female sex, gestational age of >42 wk, and birthweight of>3500 g. Almost one-quarter of Graf type IIa (-) hips may require additional treatment. Thus, significant risk factors for Graftype IIa(-)should be remembered in clinical practice.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TUNCAY, İ. C., ŞAHİN, O., HABERAL, B. (2022). Analysis of Risk Factors for Ultrasonographic GrafType IIa (−) Hips in Developmental Dysplasia: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study with Follow-Up Outcomes. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 175–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/502250

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. de Hundt M, Vlemmix F, Bais JM, Hutton EK, de Groot CJ, Mol BW, et al. Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 165(1): 8–17
  2. Edmonds EW, Hughes JL, Bomar JD, Brooks JT, Upasani VV. Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. JBJS Rev 2019; 7(12): e5
  3. Graf R. Fundamentals of sonographic diagnosis of infant hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 1984; 4(6): 735–40
  4. Graf R. Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984; 102(4): 248–55
  5. Puhan MA, Woolacott N, Kleijnen J, Steurer J. Observational studies on ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns - a systematic review. Ultraschall Med 2003; 24(6): 377–82
  6. Graf R. The use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007; 41 Suppl 1: 6–13
  7. Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R. Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 76(2): F94–100
  8. Ömeroğlu H, Akceylan A, Köse N. Associations between risk factors and developmental dysplasia of the hip and ultrasonographic hip type: a retrospective case control study. J Child Orthop 2019; 13(2): 161–6
  9. Akman A, Korkmaz A, Aksoy MC, Yazici M, Yurdakök M, Tekinalp G. Evaluation of risk factors in developmental dysplasia of the hip: results of infantile hip ultrasonography. Turk J Pediatr 2007; 49(3): 290–4
  10. Mureşan S, Mărginean MO, Voidăzan S, Vlasa I, Sîntean I. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: a useful tool for diagnosis of hip developmental dysplasia: One single-center experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98(2): e14081
  11. Sahin O, Yildirim C, Akgun RC, Haberal B, Yazici AC, Tuncay IC. Consanguineous marriage and increased risk of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus: a case-control study in a rural area. J Pediatr Orthop 2013; 33(3): 333–8
  12. Stein-Zamir C, Volovik I, Rishpon S, Sabi R. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: risk markers, clinical screening and outcome. Pediatr Int 2008; 50(3): 341–5
  13. Ortiz-Neira CL, Paolucci EO, Donnon T. A meta-analysis of common risk factors associated with the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(3): e344–51
  14. Gunay C, Atalar H, Kaptan AY, Esen E, Cavusoglu AT. Can a Hip Diagnosed as Graf Type 1According to Graf Checklist Deteriorate Over Time? A Case Serie