Dergiler / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 90

HOW THE VAN HIELE THEORY AND THE PIRIE-KIEREN THEORY CAN BE USED TO ASSESS PT’s UNDERSTANDING OF CONCEPT OF REFLECTION?

Sayfa
363–376
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

My findings show that the emphasis on a clear path of progression and requisite knowledge is a critical factor in this change of perspective, as well as the importance of well-designed tasks that illuminate characteristics for a mapping view of geometric reflection.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper seeks to investigate how the van Hiele Theory and the Pirie-Kieren Theory can be used to assess pre-service teachers’ understanding of the concept of geometric reflection.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Additionally, I contrast previous cases which utilized the van Hiele Theory and Pirie- Kieren Theory separately, noting that there is yet to be work done in which the Pirie- Kieren Theory is utilized in conjunction with dynamic geometry software.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:My findings show that the emphasis on a clear path of progression and requisite knowledge is a critical factor in this change of perspective, as well as the importance of well-designed tasks that illuminate characteristics for a mapping view of geometric reflection.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:van Hiele theory · Pirie-Kieren Theory · Geometric reflection

Abstract

This paper seeks to investigate how the van Hiele Theory and the Pirie-Kieren Theory can be used to assess pre-service teachers’ understanding of the concept of geometric reflection. These analyses include motivations for ultimately utilizing the van Hiele Theory and Pirie-Kieren Theory to examine how pre-service teachers can develop a mapping view of geometric reflection from a motion view of geometric reflection. Additionally, I contrast previous cases which utilized the van Hiele Theory and Pirie- Kieren Theory separately, noting that there is yet to be work done in which the Pirie- Kieren Theory is utilized in conjunction with dynamic geometry software. While this study is not inherently connected to these existing studies, the utilization of frameworks did play a role in our decisions for deciding on a particular framework, namely the van Hiele Theory. I acknowledge that both the van Viele and Pirie-Kieren frameworks offer insights into pre-service teachers’ thinking about geometric reflection (particularly when paired with a dynamic geometry software); however, due to certain characteristics of the van Hiele Theory (namely providing a clear progression in-depth of knowledge), I primarily suggest using the van Hiele Theory in teaching geometric reflection. My findings show that the emphasis on a clear path of progression and requisite knowledge is a critical factor in this change of perspective, as well as the importance of well-designed tasks that illuminate characteristics for a mapping view of geometric reflection.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKARSU, M. (2022). HOW THE VAN HIELE THEORY AND THE PIRIE-KIEREN THEORY CAN BE USED TO ASSESS PT’s UNDERSTANDING OF CONCEPT OF REFLECTION?. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 90, 363–376. https://ajindex.com/articles/498229

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Adolphus, T., 2011. Problems of teaching and learning of geometry in secondary schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering (IJESE), 1(2), 143-152.
  2. Akarsu, M. (2022). Understanding of geometric reflection: John’s learning path for geometric reflection. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(1), 64-89.
  3. Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D. & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practices in Cabri environments. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 34(3), 66–72.
  4. Battista, M. T. & Clements, D. H. (1996). Students’ understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 258–292. Battista,M.T.(2004).Applying cognition-based assessment to elementary schoolstudents' development of understanding of area and volume measurement. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 185-204.
  5. Breen, J. J. (1999). Achievement of van Hiele level two in geometry thinking by eight grade students through the use of geometry computer-based guided instruction. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Vermillion: The University of South Dakota School of Education. Cavey, L. O. & Berenson, S. B. (2005). Learning to teach high school mathematics: Patterns of growth in understanding right triangle trigonometry during lesson plan study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 171–190.
  6. Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1990). The effects of Logo on children's conceptualizations of angle and polygons. Journal for research in mathematics education, 21(5), 356-371.
  7. Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Yelland, N. J. & Glass, B. (2008). Learning and teaching geometry with computers in the elementary and middle school. Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics, 1, 109-154.
  8. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Constructive aspects of reflective abstraction in advanced mathematics. In Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 160-202).
  9. Springer, New York, NY. Edwards, L. (1997). Exploring the territory before proof: Students’ generalizations in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2, 187–215.
  10. Gülkılık, H., Uğurlu, H. H. & Yürük, N. (2015). Examining Students' Mathematical Understanding of Geometric Transformations Using the Pirie-Kieren Model. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6). Guven, B. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software to improve eight grade