KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 25

Examination of the Quality Teaching in Turkish Higher Education Based on the External Evaluation Reports from Multiple Perspectives

Kamil YILDIRIM
Aydın ASLAN
Sayfa
102–125
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The implications were developed to promote quality teaching.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:External evaluation has a critical function to promote quality.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, the institutional external evaluation reports prepared for 115 higher education institutions in Turkey were analyzed according to the International Quality Assurance Standards, National Institutional External Criteria, and the literature's quality indicators.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The implications were developed to promote quality teaching.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Higher education · quality teaching · national criteria

Abstract

External evaluation has a critical function to promote quality. In this study, the Turkish Higher Education System's teaching quality was examined through multiple perspectives. For this purpose, the institutional external evaluation reports prepared for 115 higher education institutions in Turkey were analyzed according to the International Quality Assurance Standards, National Institutional External Criteria, and the literature's quality indicators. The content analyses, which were conducted independently by the researchers, were compared to derive the findings. findings revealed findings revealed a lack of conceptual components, accountability, and detailed submission reports in terms of reporting. The analysis concluded that the input dimension was prioritized, whereas the process and output dimensions were neglected in the external evaluation criteria. Three different quality indicators revealed that the level of quality teaching in Turkish higher education was low. The implications were developed to promote quality teaching.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIRIM, K., ASLAN, A. (2022). Examination of the Quality Teaching in Turkish Higher Education Based on the External Evaluation Reports from Multiple Perspectives. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 25, 102–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/496930

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Akar, T., & Babadoğan, M. C. (2018). Opinions of academic administrators of regarding constructing aquality culture at education faculties. Journal of Education and Future, 1-11.
  2. Alzafari, K., & Ursin, J. (2019) Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: does context matter? Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), 58-75, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069 Basoglu, T. (2019). The relationship between student satisfaction and employee satisfaction within total quality management in higher education institutions. (Unpublished Master Thesis). İstanbul Esenyurt University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul. Bollman, L. A. (2001). Conversations on quality: perspectives on teaching and learning in higher ducation. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Minnesota, Faculty of Graduate School, the USA. Cetinsaya, G. (2014). Growing, quality and internationalization: A guide map for higher Education in Turkey. Ankara: Council of Higher Education Publishing. Council of Higher Education. (2018). Institutional external evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr web address on 14.07.2018.
  3. Dakovic, G., & Gover, A. (2019) Impact evaluation of external quality assurance by the Institutional Evaluation Program. Quality in Higher Education, 25 (2), 208-224, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2019.1635304 Dicker, M., Garcia, A. Kelly., & H. Mulrooney (2019) What does ‘quality’ in higher education mean? Perceptions of staff, students and employers, Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1425-1441, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1445987 Elken, M., & Stensaker, B. (2018). Conceptualizing ‘quality work’ in higher education, Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), 189-202, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2018.1554782 ENQA. (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area-ESG. Brussels: Eurashe. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. NY: McGraw-Hill. Gallagher, C. E. (2017). Teacher evaluation designs in an external accountability environment. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). State University of New York, Department of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, the USA. Gökmen, S. (2019). Total quality management perception in higher education institutions: Düzce University and Oviedo University samples. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Duzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Düzce. Grothe, O., & Schmid, F. (2011) Kendall's Reconsidered. Communications in Sta