KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

A Comparative Study on Consumption Functions: The Case of the European Union

Mustafa BİLİK
Recep KÖK
Sayfa
167–178
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Findings of all three methods are compatible with each other and the “PermanentIncome” hypothesis verified.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The consumption function describes the relationship between consumption expenditures and income.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As is well known,the distribution of macroeconomic data such as income and consumption is unequal.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Findings of all three methods are compatible with each other and the “PermanentIncome” hypothesis verified.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The consumption function describes the relationship between consumption expenditures and income. As is well known,the distribution of macroeconomic data such as income and consumption is unequal. Accordingly, estimators derivedfrom linear models may be inefficient. This study attempted to reach efficient estimators, using gamma distribution,within the limits of this study. The main purpose of this study is to estimate parameters of mainstream consumptionfunctions using the panel-data of EU members and negotiating countries. Using data from the World Bank, the EuropeanUnion Macroeconomic Database (AMECO), and the Bank of International Settlement (BIS), consumption functionswere estimated by the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) approach. The reliability of the estimators was tested withthe Generalized Moments Method (GMM). Furthermore, the study uses GLM, based on machine learning, to obtainrobust estimators for overfitting. Findings of all three methods are compatible with each other and the “PermanentIncome” hypothesis verified.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİLİK, M., KÖK, R. (2022). A Comparative Study on Consumption Functions: The Case of the European Union. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 167–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/495115

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alegre, J., & Pou, L. (2008). Further evidence of excess sensitivity of consumption? Nonseparability among goods and heterogeneity across households. Applied Economics, 40(7), 931–948. https://doi. org/10.1080/00036840600749896 Alimi, R. S. (2013). Keynes’ absolute income hypothesis and Kuznets paradox. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, (49310), 1–15. Retrieved from https://mpra. ub.uni-muenchen.de/49310/ Alimi, S.R. (2015), Estimating Consumption Function under Permanent Income Hypothesis: A Comparison between Nigeria and South Africa. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(11), 285-298.
  2. Altunç, Ö. F., & Aydın, C. (2014). An Estimation of the Consumption Function Under the Permanent Income Hypothesis: The Case of D-8 Countries. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 35(3), 29–41.
  3. Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1981). Estimation of dynamic models with error components. Journal of the American statistical Association, 76(375), 598-606.
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Carlo Application to Data: Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
  6. Balestra, P., & Nerlove, M. (2006). Pooling Cross Section and Time Series Data in the Estimation of a Dynamic Model: The Demand for Natural Gas. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909771
  7. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons. Baltagi, Badi H., & Levin, D. (1986). Estimating Dynamic Demand for Cigarettes Using Panel Data: The Effects of Bootlegging, Taxation and Advertising Reconsidered. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1924938 Bilgili, F. (2006). Random walk, excess smoothness or excess sensitivity? Evidence from literature and an application for Turkish economy. In: International Conference on Economics. Consumption in Turkey, Ankara,
  8. Turkey, September 12, 2006.
  9. Bilgili, F., & Bağlıtaş, H. H. (2016). Testing the permanent income and random walk hypotheses for Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1371–1378.
  10. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
  11. Blundell, R., Bond, S., Devereux, M., & Schiantarelli, F. (1992). Investment and Tobin’s Q: Ev